Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34526591›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Impact of genotypic errors with equal and unequal family contribution on accuracy of genomic prediction in aquaculture using simulation.

N Khalilisamani, P C Thomson, H W Raadsma, M S Khatkar

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

N KhalilisamaniARC Research Hub for Advanced Prawn Breeding, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia. nima.khalilisamani@sydney.edu.au.
P C ThomsonARC Research Hub for Advanced Prawn Breeding, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia.
H W RaadsmaARC Research Hub for Advanced Prawn Breeding, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia.
M S KhatkarARC Research Hub for Advanced Prawn Breeding, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genotypic errors, conflict between recorded genotype and the true genotype, can lead to false or biased population genetic parameters. Here, the effect of genotypic errors on accuracy of genomic predictions and genomic relationship matrix are investigated using a simulation study based on population and genomic structure comparable to black tiger prawn, Penaeus monodon. Fifty full-sib families across five generations with phenotypic and genotypic information on 53 K SNPs were simulated. Ten replicates of different scenarios with three heritability estimates, equal and unequal family contributions were generated. Within each scenario, four SNP densities and three genotypic error rates in each SNP density were implemented. Results showed that family contribution did not have a substantial impact on accuracy of predictions across different datasets. In the absence of genotypic errors, 3 K SNP density was found to be efficient in estimating the accuracy, whilst increasing the SNP density from 3 to 20 K resulted in a marginal increase in accuracy of genomic predictions using the current population and genomic parameters. In addition, results showed that the presence of even 10% errors in a 10 and 20 K SNP panel might not have a severe impact on accuracy of predictions. However, below 10 K marker density, even a 5% error can result in lower accuracy of predictions.

Indexed as

AquacultureGenetics, PopulationGenomicsGenotypeModels, GeneticAnimalsBreedingCrosses, GeneticFemaleInheritance PatternsMalePedigreePolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID34526591
PMCPMC8443606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.