Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34526588›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

A gain series method for accurate EMCCD calibration.

Duncan P Ryan, Megan K Dunlap, Martin P Gelfand, James H Werner, Alan K Van Orden, Peter M Goodwin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nonuniform Chemical Passivation Dynamics in Monolayer MoSThe journal of physical chemistry letters · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Duncan P RyanCenter for Integrated Nanotechnologies, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, 87545, USA. ryand@lanl.gov.
Megan K DunlapDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Martin P GelfandDepartment of Physics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
James H WernerCenter for Integrated Nanotechnologies, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, 87545, USA.
Alan K Van OrdenDepartment of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Peter M GoodwinCenter for Integrated Nanotechnologies, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, 87545, USA.

Funding

Laboratory Directed Research and Development 20180189ER
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calibration of the gain and digital conversion factor of an EMCCD is necessary for accurate photon counting. We present a new method to quickly calibrate multiple gain settings of an EMCCD camera. Acquiring gain-series calibration data and analyzing the resulting images with the EMCCD noise model more accurately estimates the gain response of the camera. Furthermore, we develop a method to compare the results from different calibration approaches. Gain-series calibration outperforms all other methods in this self-consistency test.

Identifiers

PMID34526588
PMCPMC8443689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.