ArticleEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2021
ERS/EAACI statement on adherence to international adult asthma guidelines.
Article in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the impact of GINA guideline-Concordant medication prescribing on asthma outcomes in a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A case scenario study on adherence to GINA recommendations by primary care physicians in an area of Southern Italy: the "Progetto Padre 2.0".BMC primary care · 2025Observational
- Expert opinion on gray areas in asthma management: A lesson from the innovative project "revolution in asthma" of the Italian thoracic society (AIPO-ITS).Clinical and translational allergy · 2025Review
- Effective inhaler technique education is achievable - assessment and comparison of five inhaler devices errors.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Medication Adherence in Children with Asthma.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Review
- Evaluation Checklist for the Multidisciplinary Approach to Patients with Asthma or Suspected Asthma in United Airway Disease.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2024Article
- Expert Consensus on SABA Use for Asthma Clinical Decision-Making: A Delphi Approach.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2023Review
- Assessing prescriber adherence with Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guideline-recommended reliever therapy.Internal and emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Current and Optimal Practices in Childhood Asthma Monitoring Among Multiple International Stakeholders.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- A Renewed Charter: Key Principles to Improve Patient Care in Severe Asthma.Advances in therapy · 2022Article
- Review
- Inspiring stories: the impact that being part of ERS activities can have on a professional career.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2022Article
- A Pragmatic Primary Practice Approach to Using Specific IgE in Allergy Testing in Asthma Diagnosis, Management, and Referral.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2022Review
- Medical Personnel's Utilization of Management Protocol for Pediatric Asthma Emergencies.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Guidelines aim to standardise and optimise asthma diagnosis and management. Nevertheless, adherence to guidelines is suboptimal and may vary across different healthcare professional (HCP) groups.Further to these concerns, this European Respiratory Society (ERS)/European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) statement aims to: 1) evaluate the understanding of and adherence to international asthma guidelines by HCPs of different specialties
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.