Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34526152›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2021

Simulation experiment to test strategies of geomagnetic navigation during long-distance bird migration.

Beate Zein, Jed A Long, Kamran Safi, Andrea Kölzsch, Martin Wikelski, Helmut Kruckenberg, Urška Demšar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Beate ZeinSchool of Geography and Sustainable Development, Irvine Building, University of St Andrews, North Street, KY16 9AL, St Andrews, Scotland, UK. bz1@st-andrews.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5487-8535
Jed A LongSchool of Geography and Sustainable Development, Irvine Building, University of St Andrews, North Street, KY16 9AL, St Andrews, Scotland, UK.
Kamran SafiDepartment of Migration, MPI of Animal Behavior, Radolfzell, Germany.
Andrea KölzschDepartment of Migration, MPI of Animal Behavior, Radolfzell, Germany.
Martin WikelskiDepartment of Migration, MPI of Animal Behavior, Radolfzell, Germany.
Helmut KruckenbergInstitute for Wetlands and Waterbird Research E.V, Verden (Aller), Germany.
Urška DemšarSchool of Geography and Sustainable Development, Irvine Building, University of St Andrews, North Street, KY16 9AL, St Andrews, Scotland, UK.

Funding

Leverhulme Trust RPG-2018-258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent theories suggest birds may use compass or map navigational systems associated with Earth's magnetic intensity or inclination, especially during migratory flights. These theories have only been tested by considering properties of the Earth's magnetic field at coarse temporal scales, typically ignoring the temporal dynamics of geomagnetic values that may affect migratory navigational capacity.

methodsWe designed a simulation experiment to study if and how birds use the geomagnetic field during migration by using both high resolution GPS tracking data and geomagnetic data at relatively fine spatial and temporal resolutions in comparison to previous studies. Our simulations use correlated random walks (CRW) and correlated random bridge (CRB) models to model different navigational strategies based on underlying dynamic geomagnetic data. We translated navigational strategies associated with geomagnetic cues into probability surfaces that are included in the random walk models. Simulated trajectories from these models were compared to the actual GPS trajectories of migratory birds using 3 different similarity measurements to evaluate which of the strategies was most likely to have occurred. RESULTS AND

conclusionWe designed a simulation experiment which can be applied to different wildlife species under varying conditions worldwide. In the case of our example species, we found that a compass-type strategy based on taxis, defined as movement towards an extreme value, produced the closest and most similar trajectories when compared to original GPS tracking data in CRW models. Our results indicate less evidence for map navigation (constant heading and bi-gradient taxis navigation). Additionally, our results indicate a multifactorial navigational mechanism necessitating more than one cue for successful navigation to the target. This is apparent from our simulations because the modelled endpoints of the trajectories of the CRW models do not reach close proximity to the target location of the GPS trajectory when simulated with geomagnetic navigational strategies alone. Additionally, the magnitude of the effect of the geomagnetic cues during navigation in our models was low in our CRB models. More research on the scale effects of the geomagnetic field on navigation, along with temporally varying geomagnetic data could be useful for further improving future models.

Indexed as

Bird migrationEarth’s magnetic fieldGeomagnetic navigationGreater white-fronted geeseMethod developmentNavigational strategiesRandom walk models

Identifiers

PMID34526152
PMCPMC8442449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.