Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34526088›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

Improving the continuity and coordination of ambulatory care through feedback and facilitated dialogue-a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial to evaluate the ACD study (Accountable Care in Germany).

Leonie Sundmacher, Ronja Flemming, Verena Leve, Isabel Geiger, Sebastian Franke, Thomas Czihal, Clemens Krause, Birgitt Wiese, Frank Meyer, Matthias Brittner and 10 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Leonie SundmacherDepartment of Health Economics, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60/62, 80992, München, Germany.
Ronja FlemmingDepartment of Health Economics, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60/62, 80992, München, Germany.
Verena LeveInstitute of General Practice of Heinrich-Heine University in Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Isabel GeigerDepartment of Health Economics, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60/62, 80992, München, Germany.
Sebastian FrankeDepartment of Health Economics, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60/62, 80992, München, Germany.
Thomas CzihalCentral Institute for SHI Physician Care in Germany (Zi), Salzufer 8, 10587, Berlin, Germany.
Clemens KrauseCentral Institute for SHI Physician Care in Germany (Zi), Salzufer 8, 10587, Berlin, Germany.
Birgitt WieseInstitute of General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Frank MeyerRegional Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians Westphalia Lip, Robert-Schimrigk-Str. 4-6, 44141, Dortmund, Germany.
Matthias BrittnerRegional Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians Westphalia Lip, Robert-Schimrigk-Str. 4-6, 44141, Dortmund, Germany.
Johannes PollmannsRegional Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians North Rhine, Tersteegenstraße 9, 40474, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Johannes MartinRegional Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians North Rhine, Tersteegenstraße 9, 40474, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Paul BrandenburgRegional Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians Schleswig Holstein, Bismarckallee 1-6, 23795, Bad Segeberg, Germany.
Annemarie SchultzRegional Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians Hamburg, Humboldtstraße 56, 22083, Hamburg, Germany.
Emmanuelle BruaRegional Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians Hamburg, Humboldtstraße 56, 22083, Hamburg, Germany.
Udo SchneiderTechniker Krankenkasse, Bramfelder Straße 140, 22305, Hamburg, Germany.
Olga DortmannAOK Health Insurance Rhineland/Hamburg, Kasernenstr. 61, 40213, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christoph RupprechtAOK Health Insurance Rhineland/Hamburg, Kasernenstr. 61, 40213, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Stefan WilmInstitute of General Practice of Heinrich-Heine University in Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Wiebke SchüttigDepartment of Health Economics, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 60/62, 80992, München, Germany. wiebke.schuettig@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2669-2933

Funding

German Federal Joint Committee - GBA 01VSF16046 (ACD)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients in Germany are free to seek care from any office-based physician and can always ask for multiple opinions on a diagnosis or treatment. The high density of physicians and the freedom to choose among them without referrals have led to a need for better coordination between the multiple health professionals treating any given patient. The objectives of this study are to (1) identify informal networks of physicians who treat the same patient population, (2) provide these physicians with feedback on their network and patients, using routine data and (3) give the physicians the opportunity to meet one another in facilitated network meetings.

methodsThe Accountable Care Deutschland (ACD) study is a prospective, non-blinded, cluster-randomised trial comprising a process and economic evaluation of informal networks among 12,525 GPs and office-based specialists and their 1.9 million patients. The units of allocation are the informal networks, which will be randomised either to the intervention (feedback and facilitated meetings) or control group (usual care). The informal networks will be generated by identifying connections between office-based physicians using complete datasets from the Regional Associations of Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) Physicians in Hamburg, Schleswig Holstein, North Rhine and Westphalia Lip, as well as data from three large statutory health insurers in Germany. The physicians will (a) receive feedback on selected indicators of their own treatment activity and that of the colleagues in their network and (b) will be invited to voluntary, facilitated network meetings by their Regional Association of SHI physicians. The primary outcome will be ambulatory-care-sensitive hospitalisations at baseline, at the end of the 2-year intervention period, and at six months and at 12 months after the end of the intervention period. Data will be analysed using the intention-to-treat principle. A pilot study preceded the ACD study. DISCUSSION: Cochrane reviews show that feedback can improve everyday medical practice by shedding light on previously unknown relationships. Providing physicians with information on how they are connected with their colleagues and what the outcomes are of care delivered within their informal networks can help them make these improvements, as well as strengthen their awareness of possible discontinuities in the care they provide.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register DRKS00020884 . Registered on 25 March 2020-retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareFeedbackGermanyHumansPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAmbulatory careCluster-randomised trialCollaborationContinuityCoordinationFeedbackHealth careNetworksQuality circlesQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID34526088
PMCPMC8441947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.