ArticleBMC medical education2021
A story half told: a qualitative study of medical students' self-directed learning in the clinical setting.
Article in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Self-directed learning in health professions: A mixed-methods systematic review of the literature.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Self-directed learning assessment practices in undergraduate health professions education: a systematic review.Medical education online · 2023Pooled it
- Self-directed learning and the student learning experience in undergraduate clinical science programs: a scoping review.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2025Article
- Article
- Integrating psychiatry into basic clinical skills: A three-year nationwide quantitative assessment of postgraduate training programs.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Enablers of and Barriers to Self-Regulated and Self-Directed Aptitudes of Learning (SELF-ReDiAL) in Health Professional Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Medical science educator · 2024Review
- Promotion of self-directed learning abilities among Chinese medical students through preparing for career calling and enhancing teaching competencies in medical education: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Self-directed learning for medical graduates: A boon or bane in disguise? A cross-sectional study in Chennai.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024Article
- Initial efforts to improve medical student information-seeking behavior with embedded library instruction.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2023Article
- Psychological safety in European medical students' last supervised patient encounter: A cross-sectional survey.PloS one · 2023Article
- A Longitudinal Assessment of Self-directed Learning Readiness and Development in Medical Students.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
- The spectrum of Self-directed learning perceptions among faculty members and students of Bolan University of Medical and Health Sciences.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical educators have promoted self-directed learning (SDL) as an important means of enabling students to take responsibility for their own learning throughout their training and practice. While SDL has been well-studied in classroom settings, it remains a story half told: barriers to and facilitators of SDL in the clinical setting are not yet well described. The goals of this study were to explicate student experiences of SDL in their clinical training and to identify the roles that local social and cultural contexts play in shaping their experiences of SDL.
methodsTo understand students' conceptualization and experiences of SDL in the clinical setting, we carried out a qualitative study with 15 medical students at Harvard Medical School. The semi-structured interviews were recorded and transcribed. Using an interpretivist approach, data were analyzed both deductively and inductively using the Framework method of content analysis.
resultsParticipants described patient care activities as primary motivators for engagement in SDL in the clinical setting. Participants' descriptions of SDL aligned with Knowles' steps in SDL, with an additional step of consolidation of learning related to their patients' diagnosis and management. Participants described using a range of cognitive, social-emotional, and peer learning strategies to enhance their SDL. Participants who described a growth mindset appeared to engage in SDL more easily. Learning environments that fostered SDL were those in which faculty and residents demonstrated an educational orientation, promoted psychological safety, and invited student engagement. Teams with perceived excessive work demands were perceived to be less supportive of SDL.
conclusionsOur study enhances previous classroom-based models of SDL by providing specific, practical implications for both students and faculty in the clinical training setting. Participants described SDL in the clinical setting as patient-centered, and when effectively implemented, SDL appears to support a mastery rather than performance orientation. Our study paves the way for improving medical students' clinical SDL and helping them become lifelong learners in the field of medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.