Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34525953›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2021

Attitudes towards chiropractic: a repeated cross-sectional survey of Canadian family physicians.

Jason W Busse, Sushmitha Pallapothu, Brian Vinh, Vivienne Lee, Lina Abril, Albana Canga, John J Riva, Daniel Viggiani, Marc Dilauro, Marie-Pierre Harvey and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jason W BusseDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. bussejw@mcmaster.ca.
Sushmitha PallapothuDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Brian VinhDepartment of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Vivienne LeeThe School of Interdisciplinary Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Lina AbrilDepartment of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Albana CangaInstitute for Work & Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
John J RivaDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Daniel ViggianiDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Marc DilauroMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Marie-Pierre HarveyDépartement de chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, QC, Trois-Rivières, Canada.
Isabelle PagéDépartement de chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, QC, Trois-Rivières, Canada.
Avneet K BhelaDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Serena SandhuDepartment of Biology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Oluwatoni MakanjuolaDepartment of Life Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Muhammad Taaha HassanDepartment of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Ainsley MooreDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Claude A GauthierClaude A. Gauthier, Private Practice, Gatineau, QC, Canada.
David J PriceDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
McMaster University · CACentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation · CAImpact · CAInstitute for Work & Health · CAUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières · CAUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany primary care patients receive both medical and chiropractic care; however, interprofessional relations between physicians and chiropractors are often suboptimal which may adversely affect care of shared patients. We surveyed Canadian family physicians in 2010 to explore their attitudes towards chiropractic and re-administered the same survey a decade later to explore for changes in attitudes.

methodsA 50-item survey administered to a random sample of Canadian family physicians in 2010, and again in 2019, that inquired about demographic variables, knowledge and use of chiropractic. Imbedded in our survey was a 20-item chiropractic attitude questionnaire (CAQ); scores could range from 0 to 80 with higher scores indicating more positive attitudes toward chiropractic. We constructed a multivariable regression model to explore factors associated with CAQ scores.

resultsAmong eligible physicians, 251 of 685 in 2010 (37% response rate) and 162 of 2429 in 2019 (7% response rate) provided a completed survey. Approximately half of respondents (48%) endorsed a positive impression of chiropractic, 27% were uncertain, and 25% held negative views. Most respondents (72%) referred at least some patients for chiropractic care, mainly due to patient request or lack of response to medical care. Most physicians believed that chiropractors provide effective therapy for some musculoskeletal complaints (84%) and disagreed that chiropractic care was beneficial for non-musculoskeletal conditions (77%). The majority agreed that chiropractic care was a useful supplement to conventional care (65%) but most respondents (59%) also indicated that practice diversity among chiropractors presented a barrier to interprofessional collaboration. In our adjusted regression model, attitudes towards chiropractic showed trivial improvement from 2010 to 2019 (0.31 points on the 80-point CAQ; 95%CI 0.001 to 0.62). More negative attitudes were associated with older age (- 1.55 points for each 10-year increment from age 28; 95%CI - 2.67 to - 0.44), belief that adverse events are common with chiropractic care (- 1.41 points; 95% CI - 2.59 to - 0.23) and reported use of the research literature (- 6.04 points; 95% CI - 8.47 to - 3.61) or medical school (- 5.03 points; 95% CI  - 7.89 to - 2.18) as sources of knowledge on chiropractic. More positive attitudes were associated with endorsing a relationship with a specific chiropractor (5.24 points; 95% CI 2.85 to 7.64), family and friends (4.06 points; 95% CI 1.53 to 6.60), or personal treatment experience (4.63 points; 95% CI 2.14 to 7.11) as sources of information regarding chiropractic.

conclusionsAlthough generally positive, Canadian family physicians' attitudes towards chiropractic are diverse, and most physicians felt that practice diversity among chiropractors was a barrier to interprofessional collaboration.

Indexed as

ChiropracticAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPhysicians, FamilySurveys and QuestionnairesAttitude of health personnelChiropracticGeneral practiceInterprofessional relationsPhysiciansSurveySurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34525953
PMCPMC8442384
OpenAlexW3134773172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.