Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34525939›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

FALCON2: a web server for high-quality prediction of protein tertiary structures.

Lupeng Kong, Fusong Ju, Haicang Zhang, Shiwei Sun, Dongbo Bu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lupeng Kong *Key Lab of Intelligent Information Processing, Big-Data Academy, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100190, Beijing, China.
Fusong Ju *Key Lab of Intelligent Information Processing, Big-Data Academy, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100190, Beijing, China.
Haicang ZhangKey Lab of Intelligent Information Processing, Big-Data Academy, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100190, Beijing, China.
Shiwei SunKey Lab of Intelligent Information Processing, Big-Data Academy, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100190, Beijing, China.
Dongbo BuKey Lab of Intelligent Information Processing, Big-Data Academy, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100190, Beijing, China. dbu@ict.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4119-4238

Funding

national key research and development program of china 2020YFA0907000national natural science foundation of china 31671369national natural science foundation of china 31770775national natural science foundation of china 62072435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate prediction of protein tertiary structures is highly desired as the knowledge of protein structures provides invaluable insights into protein functions. We have designed two approaches to protein structure prediction, including a template-based modeling approach (called ProALIGN) and an ab initio prediction approach (called ProFOLD). Briefly speaking, ProALIGN aligns a target protein with templates through exploiting the patterns of context-specific alignment motifs and then builds the final structure with reference to the homologous templates. In contrast, ProFOLD uses an end-to-end neural network to estimate inter-residue distances of target proteins and builds structures that satisfy these distance constraints. These two approaches emphasize different characteristics of target proteins: ProALIGN exploits structure information of homologous templates of target proteins while ProFOLD exploits the co-evolutionary information carried by homologous protein sequences. Recent progress has shown that the combination of template-based modeling and ab initio approaches is promising.

resultsIn the study, we present FALCON2, a web server that integrates ProALIGN and ProFOLD to provide high-quality protein structure prediction service. For a target protein, FALCON2 executes ProALIGN and ProFOLD simultaneously to predict possible structures and selects the most likely one as the final prediction result. We evaluated FALCON2 on widely-used benchmarks, including 104 CASP13 (the 13th Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction) targets and 91 CASP14 targets. In-depth examination suggests that when high-quality templates are available, ProALIGN is superior to ProFOLD and in other cases, ProFOLD shows better performance. By integrating these two approaches with different emphasis, FALCON2 server outperforms the two individual approaches and also achieves state-of-the-art performance compared with existing approaches.

conclusionsBy integrating template-based modeling and ab initio approaches, FALCON2 provides an easy-to-use and high-quality protein structure prediction service for the community and we expect it to enable insights into a deep understanding of protein functions.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerProteinsAmino Acid SequenceComputersProtein ConformationSoftwareProteinsAb initio predictionProtein structure predictionProtein structure prediction web serviceTemplate-based modeling

Identifiers

PMID34525939
PMCPMC8444573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.