Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34525188›Full record

Trial reportBlood2022

Long-term outcomes in patients with severe aplastic anemia treated with immunosuppression and eltrombopag: a phase 2 study.

Bhavisha A Patel, Emma M Groarke, Jennifer Lotter, Ruba Shalhoub, Fernanda Gutierrez-Rodrigues, Olga Rios, Diego Quinones Raffo, Colin O Wu, Neal S Young

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01623167 (Eltrombopag Added to Standard Immunosuppression in Treatment-Naive Severe Aplastic Anemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 89 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01623167 phase1 / phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

Eltrombopag Added to Standard Immunosuppression in Treatment-Naive Severe Aplastic Anemia

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)Ran2012 to 2029Enrolled207ConditionsSevere Aplastic AnemiaArmsCohort 1: hATG, CsA, EPAG Day 14 to Month 6, Cohort 2: hATG, CsA, EPAG Day 14 to Month 3, Cohort 3: hATG, CsA (dose reduced), EPAG day 1 to month 6, Extension Cohort
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bhavisha A PatelHematology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and.ORCID 0000-0002-2974-7701
Emma M GroarkeHematology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and.ORCID 0000-0002-4648-5926
Jennifer LotterHematology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and.
Ruba ShalhoubOffice of Biostatistics Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Fernanda Gutierrez-RodriguesHematology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and.ORCID 0000-0003-3116-4588
Olga RiosHematology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and.
Diego Quinones RaffoHematology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and.
Colin O WuOffice of Biostatistics Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Neal S YoungHematology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and.

Funding

Pathogenesis And Treatment Of Aplastic AnemiaZIAHL002315 · NHLBI · NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE · PI YOUNG, NEAL S · 2009 to 2025
$60.1M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) are either treated with bone marrow transplant (BMT) or immunosuppression (IST) depending on their age, comorbidities, and available donors. In 2017, our phase 2 trial reported improved hematologic responses with the addition of eltrombopag (EPAG) to standard IST for SAA when compared with a historical cohort treated with IST alone. However, the rates and characteristics of long-term complications, relapse, and clonal evolution, previously described in patients treated with IST alone, are not yet known with this new regimen, IST and EPAG. Patients were accrued from 2012 to 2020, with a total of 178 subjects included in this secondary endpoint analysis. With double the sample size and a much longer median follow-up (4 years) since the original publication in 2017, we report a cumulative relapse rate of 39% in responding patients who received cyclosporine (CSA) maintenance and clonal evolution of 15% in all treated patients at 4 years. Relapse occurred at distinct timepoints: after CSA dose reduction and EPAG discontinuation at 6 months, and after 2 years when CSA was discontinued. Most relapsed patients were retreated with therapeutic doses of CSA +/- EPAG, and two-thirds responded. Clonal evolution to a myeloid malignancy or chromosome 7 abnormality (high-risk) was noted in 5.7% of patients and conferred a poorer overall survival. Neither relapse nor high-risk evolution occurred at a higher rate than was observed in a historical comparator cohort, but the median time to both events was earlier in IST and EPAG treated patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01623167.

Indexed as

AdultAnemia, AplasticBenzoatesCyclosporineFemaleHumansHydrazinesImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPyrazolesSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultBenzoatesCyclosporineeltrombopagHydrazinesImmunosuppressive AgentsPyrazoles

Identifiers

PMID34525188
PMCPMC8718619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.