Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34525114›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Stromal marker fibroblast activation protein drives outcome in T1 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Tim Muilwijk, Murat Akand, Sofie Daelemans, Koen Marien, Yannick Waumans, Mark Kockx, Loïc Baekelandt, Thomas Van den Broeck, Frank Van der Aa, Thomas Gevaert and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Tim MuilwijkDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6965-389X
Murat AkandDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sofie DaelemansPathology - Histology, Imaging and Quantification, CellCarta, Antwerp, Belgium.
Koen MarienPathology - Histology, Imaging and Quantification, CellCarta, Antwerp, Belgium.
Yannick WaumansPathology - Histology, Imaging and Quantification, CellCarta, Antwerp, Belgium.
Mark KockxPathology - Histology, Imaging and Quantification, CellCarta, Antwerp, Belgium.
Loïc BaekelandtDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Thomas Van den BroeckDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Frank Van der AaDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Thomas GevaertDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Steven JoniauDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEProvince of Antwerp · BEOrgan Recovery Systems (Belgium) · BEAZ Klina · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fibroblast activation protein-α (FAP) is a transmembrane peptidase and a surrogate marker for cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). FAP has been linked to worse prognosis and therapy resistance in several cancers. We hypothesised that FAP might have a prognostic 3biomarker potential to stratify patients with high-grade (HG) T1 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). We selected 30 patients with HG T1 NMIBC that progressed to ≥T2 disease which were pair-matched based on CUETO progression score variables with 90 patients that did not progress. After revision a final cohort of 86 patients was retained. Slides were stained for FAP, the luminal marker GATA3 and the basal marker CK5. All HG T1 tumour regions of interest (ROIs) within each patient were annotated, analysed and scored using image analysis software. FAP expression in HG T1 ROIs was significantly higher in progressors vs. non-progressors and was prognostic for recurrence-free survival, progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival. FAP expression in HG T1 ROIs remained strongly prognostic for these outcomes in a bivariable model corrected for adequate BCG per FDA definition. Expression of GATA3 and CK5 did not differ between progressors vs. non-progressors, and were not prognostic for these outcomes. FAP might serve as an easily applicable prognostic biomarker to risk-stratify patients with HG T1 NMIBC if these results are prospectively validated in a larger series.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Transitional CellDisease ProgressionFemaleFibroblastsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRiskBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID34525114
PMCPMC8443055
OpenAlexW3199486860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.