Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34525094›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Connecting post-release mortality to the physiological stress response of large coastal sharks in a commercial longline fishery.

Nicholas M Whitney, Karissa O Lear, John J Morris, Robert E Hueter, John K Carlson, Heather M Marshall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicholas M WhitneyAnderson Cabot Center for Ocean Life, New England Aquarium, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8797-6927
Karissa O LearCentre for Sustainable Aquatic Ecosystems, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
John J MorrisCenter for Shark Research, Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, Florida, United States of America.
Robert E HueterCenter for Shark Research, Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, Florida, United States of America.
John K CarlsonSoutheast Fisheries Science Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Panama City, Florida, United States of America.
Heather M MarshallCenter for Shark Research, Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, Florida, United States of America.
Mote Marine Laboratory · USMurdoch University · AUNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration · USNew England Aquarium · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bycatch mortality is a major factor contributing to shark population declines. Post-release mortality (PRM) is particularly difficult to quantify, limiting the accuracy of stock assessments. We paired blood-stress physiology with animal-borne accelerometers to quantify PRM rates of sharks caught in a commercial bottom longline fishery. Blood was sampled from the same individuals that were tagged, providing direct correlation between stress physiology and animal fate for sandbar (Carcharhinus plumbeus, N = 130), blacktip (C. limbatus, N = 105), tiger (Galeocerdo cuvier, N = 52), spinner (C. brevipinna, N = 14), and bull sharks (C. leucas, N = 14). PRM rates ranged from 2% and 3% PRM in tiger and sandbar sharks to 42% and 71% PRM in blacktip and spinner sharks, respectively. Decision trees based on blood values predicted mortality with >67% accuracy in blacktip and spinner sharks, and >99% accuracy in sandbar sharks. Ninety percent of PRM occurred within 5 h after release and 59% within 2 h. Blood physiology indicated that PRM was primarily associated with acidosis and increases in plasma potassium levels. Total fishing mortality reached 62% for blacktip and 89% for spinner sharks, which may be under-estimates given that some soak times were shortened to focus on PRM. Our findings suggest that no-take regulations may be beneficial for sandbar, tiger, and bull sharks, but less effective for more susceptible species such as blacktip and spinner sharks.

Indexed as

Stress, PhysiologicalAcidosisAnimalsFisheriesMortalityPotassiumRisk AssessmentSharksPotassium

Identifiers

PMID34525094
PMCPMC8443047
OpenAlexW3201137649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.