Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34524637›Full record

ArticleApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2022

Biogas and Volatile Fatty Acid Production During Anaerobic Digestion of Straw, Cellulose, and Hemicellulose with Analysis of Microbial Communities and Functions.

Jie Liu, Xiaoyu Zuo, Ke Peng, Rui He, Luyao Yang, Rufei Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jie LiuDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 15 BeiSanhuan East Road, ChaoYang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoyu ZuoDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 15 BeiSanhuan East Road, ChaoYang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China. zuoxy@mail.buct.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8250-4311
Ke PengDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 15 BeiSanhuan East Road, ChaoYang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China.
Rui HeDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 15 BeiSanhuan East Road, ChaoYang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China.
Luyao YangDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 15 BeiSanhuan East Road, ChaoYang District, Beijing, 100029, People's Republic of China.
Rufei LiuChina Urban Construction Design & Research Institute, No.36, Deshengmenwai Street, Beijing, China.
Beijing University of Chemical Technology · CNBeijing Urban Construction Design & Development Group (China) · CN

Funding

Key Technologies Research and Development Program 2018YFE111000National Natural Science Foundation of China 21808010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The anaerobic digestion efficiency and methane production of straw was limited by its complex composition and structure. In this study, rice straw (RS), cellulose, and hemicellulose were used as raw materials to study biogas production performance and changes in the volatile fatty acids (VFAs). Further, microbial communities and genetic functions were analyzed separately for each material. The biogas production potential of RS, cellulose, and hemicellulose was different, with cumulative biogas production of 283.75, 412.50, and 620.64 mL/(g·VS), respectively. The methane content of the biogas produced from cellulose and hemicellulose was approximately 10% higher than that produced from RS after the methane content stabilized. The accumulation of VFAs occurred in the early stage of anaerobic digestion in all materials, and the cumulative amount of VFAs in both cellulose and hemicellulose was relatively higher than that in RS, and the accumulation time was 12 and 14 days longer, respectively. When anaerobic digestion progressed to a stable stage, Clostridium was the dominant bacterial genus in all three anaerobic digestion systems, and the abundance of Ruminofilibacter was higher during anaerobic digestion of RS. Genetically, anaerobic digestion of all raw materials proceeded mainly via aceticlastic methanogenesis, with similar functional components. The different performance of anaerobic digestion of RS, cellulose, and hemicellulose mainly comes from the difference of composition of raw materials. Increasing the accessibility of cellulose and hemicellulose in RS feedstock by pretreatment is an effective way to improve the efficiency of anaerobic digestion. Since the similar microbial community structure will be acclimated during anaerobic digestion, there is no need to adjust the initial inoculum when the accessibility of cellulose and hemicellulose changes.

Indexed as

BiofuelsCelluloseFatty Acids, VolatilePolysaccharidesAnaerobiosisMethaneMicrobiotaOryzaBiofuelsCelluloseFatty Acids, VolatilehemicelluloseMethanePolysaccharidesMetabolic pathwaysMetagenomicsMethane metabolismProcess parameters

Identifiers

PMID34524637
OpenAlexW3156296992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.