Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34524575›Full record

ReviewJournal of occupational rehabilitation2021

Development of a Programme Theory for Early Intervention Vocational Rehabilitation: A Realist Literature Review.

Jennifer A Dunn, Jonathan J Hackney, Rachelle A Martin, Donna Tietjens, Timothy Young, John A Bourke, Deborah L Snell, Joanne L Nunnerley, Andrew Hall, Sarah Derrett

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jennifer A DunnDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 4345, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand. jennifer.dunn@otago.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-2894-7533
Jonathan J HackneyBurwood Academy Trust, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Rachelle A MartinBurwood Academy Trust, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Donna TietjensWellington Medical and Health Sciences Library, University of Otago, Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Timothy YoungBurwood Academy Trust, Christchurch, New Zealand.
John A BourkeBurwood Academy Trust, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Deborah L SnellDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 4345, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand.
Joanne L NunnerleyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 4345, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand.
Andrew HallNew Zealand Spinal Trust, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Sarah DerrettPreventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Little is currently known about how early intervention vocational rehabilitation (EIVR) works for people with newly acquired neurological conditions such as traumatic brain injury, acquired brain injury and spinal cord injury. This study aims, from a realist framework, to identify relevant literature and develop an initial programme theory to understand how EIVR might work for people experiencing acquired neurological disability. Realist reviews are ideally placed to address the identified knowledge gap as they assist in gaining a deeper understanding of how the intervention works, for whom it works best, and the contexts that promote the activation of desired outcomes. Methods We used a seven-step iterative process to synthesise literature using a realist approach. The steps included: development of initial programme theory, literature search, article selection, extracting and data organising, synthesis of evidence and programme theory refinement. We performed a literature search using the following databases: Cinahl, Embase, EMcare, Medline, PsychInfo and Scopus. Articles were selected if they contributed to the knowledge describing what is EIVR and how it works in newly acquired neurological conditions. Data were extracted and synthesised to develop a programme theory for EIVR. Results Following screening of 448 references, 37 documents were eligible for data extraction. We developed a refined programme theory of EIVR consisting of three contexts (prioritisation of exploring work options, return to work discussed as an option, and workplace support), nine mechanisms (ensuring rehabilitation teams' culture, fostering hope, exploring options, optimising self-efficacy, maintaining worker identity, staying connected, setting goals, engaging employer, and flexing roles) and three outcomes (confidence in ability to work, psychological adjustment, and engagement in solution focussed options). Conclusions This appears to be the first paper to explore how EIVR works, for whom and in what situations. We have produced a programme theory that may provide an initial understanding of EIVR following acquired neurological conditions.

Indexed as

PublicationsRehabilitation, VocationalHumansEarly interventionNeurological disabilityRealist reviewVocational rehabilitation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.