Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34524526›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Hodgkin lymphoma survivor perspectives on their engagement in treatment decision-making and discussion of late effects.

Rachel Murphy-Banks, Anita J Kumar, Mingqian Lin, Nicole Savidge, Emma Livne, Susan K Parsons

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Knowledge gaps among adult Hodgkin lymphoma survivors: implications for risk‑based care.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel Murphy-BanksInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St., #345, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Anita J KumarInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St., #345, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Mingqian LinInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St., #345, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Nicole SavidgeInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St., #345, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Emma LivneInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St., #345, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Susan K ParsonsInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St., #345, Boston, MA, 02111, USA. sparsons@tuftsmedicalcenter.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0282-6490
Tufts Medical Center · USTufts University · US

Funding

Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (Pilot Supplement)UL1TR002544 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SELKER, HARRY P. · 2018 to 2022
$50.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHodgkin lymphoma has a bimodal age distribution with the first peak occurring within young adulthood and the second, among older adults. Although current therapy provides excellent disease control, survivors are at risk of developing treatment-related late effects (LEs). We sought to understand how survivors in active survivorship care perceived their role in treatment decision-making and when they acquired an understanding of LEs.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted until saturation was reached. Themes were identified through direct content analysis and consensus coding by a multidisciplinary team of coders, including hematology/oncology providers, patient navigators, and survivor stakeholders.

resultsSeventeen interviews were conducted. Role in initial treatment decision-making fluctuated between passive and active engagement with providers identified as being crucial to this process. Half of interviewees (53%) expressed unmet information needs. Survivors reported having learned about LEs at multiple time points, spanning from before treatment commenced through when a LE was diagnosed. The majority (71%) expressed a desire to have learned about LEs before initial treatment ended. The impact of cancer and fertility discussions were also disclosed. DISCUSSION: Participants highlighted the importance of discussions on LEs early in the care continuum. These preliminary data will be incorporated in a planned treatment decision-making tool that incorporates information on potential LEs. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Patient-centered communication approaches should be embraced to assist in treatment decision-making, while considering long-term health consequences. Survivors must be educated on their risk of LEs and encouraged to disclose their perspectives and preferences with their providers to optimize outcomes.

Indexed as

Hodgkin DiseaseAdultAgedCommunicationHumansPatient Care PlanningSurvivorsSurvivorshipYoung AdultHodgkin lymphomaLate effectsPatient-centered communicationSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID34524526
PMCPMC10642770
OpenAlexW3199261121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.