ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2021
[Benefit assessment of digital health applications-challenges and opportunities].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of Multimodal App-Based Interventions on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- [Digital health applications in psychotherapeutic care in dermatology?-Overview of offers, opportunities, and challenges].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of mHealth applications for depression in Germany using a Markov cohort simulation.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Negotiating pricing and payment terms for insurance covered mHealth apps: a qualitative content analysis and taxonomy development based on a German experience.Health economics review · 2024Article
- Key Considerations for Designing Clinical Studies to Evaluate Digital Health Solutions.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Digital Health Applications (DiHA): Approaches to develop a reimbursement process for the statutory health insurance in Austria.Health policy and technology · 2023Article
- Evidence requirements of permanently listed digital health applications (DiGA) and their implementation in the German DiGA directory: an analysis.BMC health services research · 2023Review
- Randomized trials on non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: a scoping review.BMJ evidence-based medicine · 2022Article
- Digital health applications and the fast-track pathway to public health coverage in Germany: challenges and opportunities based on first results.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Opportunities and barriers for reimbursement of digital therapeutics in Austria: Findings From expert interviews.Digital healthArticle
- Application of wearables for remote monitoring of oncology patients: A scoping review.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital health applications promise to improve patient health and medical care. This analysis provides a brief overview of evidence-based benefit assessment and the challenges to the underlying evidence as prerequisites for optimal patient-oriented decision making. Classical concepts in study design, recent developments, and innovative approaches are described with the aim of highlighting future areas of development in innovative study designs and strategic evaluation concepts for digital health applications. A special focus is on pragmatic study designs.Evidence-based benefit assessment has fundamental requirements and criteria regardless of the type of treatments evaluated. Reliable evidence is essential. Fast, efficient, reliable, and practice-relevant evaluation of digital health applications is not achieved by turning to nonrandomized trials, but rather by better pragmatic randomized trials. They are feasible and combine the characteristics of digital health applications, classical methodological concepts, and new approaches to study conduct. Routinely collected data, low-contact study conduct (remote trials, virtual trials), and digital biomarkers promote useful randomized real-world evidence as solid evidence base for digital health applications. Continuous learning evaluation with randomized designs embedded in routine care is key to sustainable and efficient benefit assessment of digital health applications and may be crucial for strategic improvement of healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.