Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34524474›Full record

ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2021

[Twin research in Germany].

Paul Enck, Miriam Goebel-Stengel, Olaf Rieß, Jeannette Hübener-Schmid, Karl Oliver Kagan, Andreas Michael Nieß, Henning Tümmers, Urban Wiesing, Stephan Zipfel, Andreas Stengel and 1 more

Abstract readReviewTwin Study
In one paragraph

Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Paul EnckInnere Medizin VI, Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Osianderstr. 5, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Miriam Goebel-StengelInnere Medizin VI, Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Osianderstr. 5, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland. miriam.stengel@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Olaf RießInstitut für Medizinische Genetik und Angewandte Genomik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Jeannette Hübener-SchmidInstitut für Medizinische Genetik und Angewandte Genomik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Karl Oliver KaganDepartment für Frauengesundheit, Universitäts-Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Andreas Michael NießInnere Medizin V, Sportmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Henning TümmersInstitut für Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Urban WiesingInstitut für Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Stephan ZipfelInnere Medizin VI, Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Osianderstr. 5, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
Andreas StengelInnere Medizin VI, Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Osianderstr. 5, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
TwinHealth-Konsortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The worldwide development of twin cohorts began after World War II. These cohorts now include around 1.5 million twins, and more than 2748 twin studies have been published between 1950 and 2012. Each year, the number of twin publications increases by another 500 to 1000. The underrepresentation of German twin studies cannot be solely explained by the abuse of medical research under National Socialism. Developing and expanding large twin cohorts is a challenge in terms of both ethics and data protection. However, twin cohorts enable long-term and real-time research on many medical issues and contribute to answer the question of predisposition or environment as possible disease triggers - even after the sequencing of the human genome.There are currently two German twin cohorts: the biomedical cohort HealthTwiSt, with around 1500 pairs of twins, and TwinLife, a sociological-psychological cohort with around 4000 pairs of twins. There are also disease-specific cohorts. The TwinHealth Consortium in the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Tübingen was established in 2016 with the aim of enabling open-ended and sustainable twin research in Tübingen to answer various scientific questions.With the help of systematic literature research and medical history, this article gives an overview of the worldwide development of twin studies and databases over the last 100 years. The example of the Tübingen TwinHealth Initiative illuminates the structure of a twin cohort and its legal, ethical, and data protection aspects.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchDiseases in TwinsCohort StudiesGermanyHumansConcordanceDizygoticGenesMonozygoticTwinHealth

Identifiers

PMID34524474
PMCPMC8441034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.