Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34524471›Full record

ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2021

Methods and cell-based strategies to produce antibody libraries: current state.

Paula Matos de Brito, Andreia Saruga, Miguel Cardoso, Joao Goncalves

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Advances in Nanobody-Based Platforms for Precision Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paula Matos de Brito *Faculty of Pharmacy, iMed.ULisboa - Research Institute for Medicines, University of Lisbon, Av. Professor Gama Pinto, 1649-019, Lisbon, Portugal.
Andreia Saruga *Faculty of Pharmacy, iMed.ULisboa - Research Institute for Medicines, University of Lisbon, Av. Professor Gama Pinto, 1649-019, Lisbon, Portugal.
Miguel CardosoFaculty of Pharmacy, iMed.ULisboa - Research Institute for Medicines, University of Lisbon, Av. Professor Gama Pinto, 1649-019, Lisbon, Portugal.
Joao GoncalvesFaculty of Pharmacy, iMed.ULisboa - Research Institute for Medicines, University of Lisbon, Av. Professor Gama Pinto, 1649-019, Lisbon, Portugal. jgoncalv@ff.ulisboa.pt.

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 2020.08317.BDFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PD/BD/ 143016/2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibodies are critical components of the adaptive immune system, whose therapeutic applications have been growing exponentially in the last years. Discovery and development of therapeutic antibodies encompasses in vivo immunization, synthetic libraries, and surface display methodologies. To overcome some of their limitations, several platforms in higher eukaryotic cells have been developed. Moreover, these platforms aim to replicate in the bench both primary and secondary antibody diversification mechanisms that occur in vivo. Here, we describe the latest strategies that have been used to mirror both naïve and affinity-maturated antibody repertoire. KEY POINTS: • Therapeutic antibodies are one of the most promising classes of drugs to fight diseases. • Antibodies discovered through hybridoma or display technologies require further engineering. • Innovative antibody discovery platforms in higher eukaryotic cells have been developed.

Indexed as

Antibody affinityAntibody discoveryAntibody librariesEx vivo antibody diversificationTherapeutic antibody

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.