ArticleJAMA network open2021
Evaluation of Epidural Analgesia Use During Labor and Infection in Full-term Neonates Delivered Vaginally.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of intrapartum maternal fever on neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Labor analgesia: knowledge, attitudes, and practices among pregnant women and husbands in Wuhan: a cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Views of healthcare providers on the provision of continuous care during labour by maternity care assistants in the Netherlands: a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Article
- The Effects of Acupoint Stimulation Combined With Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Labor Pain: Protocol for a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of Dynamic Nomograms for Predicting Delivery Mode and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admission in Intrapartum Fever: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Development of a Machine Learning Model to Predict Epidural-Related Maternal Fever During Labor Analgesia: A Multi-Algorithm Comparative Study with Prospective Implementation Framework.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Association of epidural analgesia in labor with neurodevelopmental outcomes in premature infants born at <29 weeks of gestational age.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024Article
- COVID-19 Omicron variant infection has minimal impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A cross-sectional cohort study.Nursing open · 2024Article
- Procedural analgesic interventions in China: a national survey of 2198 hospitals.BMC anesthesiology · 2022Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as an Adjuvant for Combined Spinal-Epidural Analgesia for Labor.Anesthesia, essays and researchesArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Quantification of potential consequences associated with the use of epidural analgesia during labor could help to improve the safety and quality of labor and delivery care for parturient women. Objective: To evaluate the association between epidural analgesia use during labor and neonatal infection in a large cohort of parturient women. Design, Setting, and Participants: This propensity score-matched cohort study was conducted at a university-affiliated hospital in Shanghai, China. Women at full-term pregnancy undergoing vaginal delivery between January 2013 and October 2018 were included in the study. Parturient women who were parous, experiencing premature delivery (gestational age <37 weeks), were pregnant with more than 1 fetus, or had experienced a stillbirth were excluded. Data were analyzed from October 2019 to June 2020. Exposures: The use of epidural analgesia during labor. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the incidence of neonatal infection, including neonatal sepsis, neonatal uncharacterized infection, neonatal pneumonia, and neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis reported in the medical record. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of maternal intrapartum fever and histologic chorioamnionitis. Results: Among 37 786 parturient women included (mean [SD] age, 29.5 [3.0] years), 19 968 (52.8%) received epidural analgesia during labor. In the propensity score-matched cohort (including 15 401 parturient women in each group), use of epidural analgesia was associated with a higher incidence of neonatal infection (absolute risk difference, 2.6%, 95% CI, 2.2%-3.0%; relative risk [RR], 2.43; 95% CI, 2.11-2.78), including higher incidence of sepsis (absolute risk difference, 0.1%, 95% CI, 0.1%-0.2%; RR, 3.50; 95% CI, 1.73-7.07) and uncharacterized infection (absolute risk difference, 2.2%, 95% CI, 1.9% to 2.6%; RR, 2.69; 95% CI, 2.30-3.15), compared with no epidural analgesia use. Use of epidural analgesia was also associated with greater incidence of maternal intrapartum fever (RR, 4.12; 95% CI, 3.78-4.50) and histologic chorioamnionitis (RR, 4.08; 95% CI, 3.59-4.64) compared with no epidural analgesia use. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that use of epidural analgesia in full-term nulliparous women undergoing vaginal delivery was associated with an increased risk of neonatal infection, pending further investigation. These findings support efforts to further improve safety and quality of labor and delivery care for parturient women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.