Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34524431›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric psychology2022

Predicting Adolescent Electronic Cigarette Use: Differences by Never, Ever, and Current Users.

Paul T Enlow, Desireé N Williford, Katelyn F Romm, Geri A Dino, Melissa D Blank, Pamela J Murray, Christine A Banvard, Christina L Duncan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Paul T EnlowCenter for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health System, Wilmington, DE, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2665-198X
Desireé N WillifordDepartment of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Katelyn F RommMilken Institute of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Geri A DinoWV Prevention and Research Center, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, WVU School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Melissa D BlankDepartment of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Pamela J MurrayDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Adolescent Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Christine A BanvardDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Adolescent Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Christina L DuncanDepartment of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
West Virginia University · USMilken Institute · USThomas Jefferson University · USWest Virginia University Hospitals · US

Funding

West Virginia Prevention Research CenterU48DP006391 · DP · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI DINO, GERI A, MANN, MICHAEL J · 2018 to 2023
$4.2M
Research Training Program in the Behavioral and Biomedical SciencesT32GM081741 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI BERREBI, ALBERT S, SIMPKINS, JAMES W. · 2008 to 2018
$2.1M
ACL HHS U48DP006391NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006391NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM081741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRising rates of adolescent electronic cigarette (ECIG) use is concerning because it can lead to adverse health outcomes and increased risk behavior. There are known predictors of ever versus never ECIG use, but less are known about risk factors for ever versus current use of ECIGs. Problem behavior theory (PBT) was used to evaluate possible risk factors for different ECIG use status.

methodsParticipants were 573 high school students who completed questionnaires measuring ECIG use, as well as constructs within the Social Environment, Perceived Environment, Personality, and Behavior domains of PBT. Multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate how predictor variables differentiated between participants who reported (a) never use, (b) ever ECIG use, or (c) current ECIG use.

resultsAdolescents were more likely to endorse ever ECIG use than never use if they reported peer ECIG use, perceived more benefits and fewer costs (e.g., health) of ECIG use, higher extraversion, alcohol and cigarette use (never vs. ever vs. past 30 days), or attended a school with a higher percentage of socioeconomically disadvantaged students. Adolescents were more likely to report current ECIG use than ever ECIG use if they perceived fewer costs of ECIG use or used cannabis in their lifetime (yes/no).

conclusionsPBT variables differentiated between ever ECIG use and never ECIG use. However, these variables did not differentiate between ever and current ECIG use. Identifying unique risk factors for current versus ever ECIG use is important to understanding persistent ECIG use and subsequent targeted prevention and intervention programs.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsVapingAdolescentHumansSchoolsStudentsSurveys and Questionnairesadolescentshealth behaviorrisk behaviortobacco use

Identifiers

PMID34524431
PMCPMC9125499
OpenAlexW3201593837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.