SynthesisJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2021
Are functional outcomes and reoperation rates really better than those of cementless stems in displaced femoral neck fractures? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in current-generation stem designs.
Synthesis in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Health-Related Quality of Life for Cemented Versus Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Elderly Patients With Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty in Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures is associated with Higher Perioperative Surgical Complications but Lower Medical Complications: Analysis from the National Inpatient Database.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of the study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the functional outcomes and reoperation rates of cemented and cementless hip arthroplasty for treating displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.
methodsSystematic searches were conducted of literature up to December 2018 on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning current-generation stem designs only. Two reviewers independently determined eligibility, extracted the outcome data and assessed the risk of bias of eligible studies. The follow-up data and complication rates were pooled by using random-effects models and fixed-effects models, with mean differences and risk ratios for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively.
resultsEight RCTs involving 1361 patients (1361 hips) were included in the meta-analysis. Cemented stems were associated with fewer implant-related complications (odds ratio [OR] = 0.303; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.185%-0.496%; p < 0.001) and reoperations (OR = 0.492; 95% CI, 0.247%-0.977%; p = 0.043). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in functional outcomes, including those assessed by the EuroQol(EQ)-5D and Harris Hip Score, mortality rates, major systemic complications, minor local complications, operation times, intraoperative blood losses, and lengths of hospital stays.
conclusionIn treating displaced femoral neck fracture in elderly patients with hip arthroplasty with current-generation stems, cemented stems were found to have fewer implant-related complications and reoperations than those of cementless stems. Functional outcomes and mortality rates were similar between the groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.