Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34523820›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2021

The costs of bipolar disorder in the United Kingdom.

Judit Simon, Anees A Abdul Pari, Jane Wolstenholme, Michael Berger, Guy M Goodwin, John R Geddes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Electroconvulsive therapy and autobiographical memory.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2026
    Article
  7. Bipolar disorder.Lancet (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bipolar disorders: an update on critical aspects.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The economic burden of bipolar disorder: a case study in Southern Iran.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Judit SimonDepartment of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9279-8627
Anees A Abdul PariHERC, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jane WolstenholmeHERC, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Michael BergerDepartment of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1183-8410
Guy M GoodwinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford and Oxford Health NHS Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
John R GeddesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford and Oxford Health NHS Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo estimate the individual cost and population-level economic burden of Bipolar Disorder (BD), and explore the impact of clinical and sociodemographic factors on costs in the United Kingdom.

methodsAnnual UK health care, social care and societal cost data were collected from a prospective cohort of 91 BD patients using digital monitoring of symptoms. Costs (in £) were calculated for the year of resource use collection (2010-2011) and main results inflated to year 2018-2019. A Generalized Estimating Equation framework was used to investigate individual factors influencing costs. An economic burden estimate was derived by multiplying the mean annual cost per patient with literature-based population prevalence.

resultsThe average annual cost of BD per patient was £12,617 (SE = ±£1085) or £14,938 (SE = ±£1281) at 2018-2019 prices with 68% of the total costs attributed to lost productivity and informal care, 31% to health care costs, 1% to private out-of-pocket expenses, and 0.5% to social care costs. A unit increase in average levels of depressive or manic symptoms were associated with 7% and 11% higher societal costs, respectively. The estimated annual prevalence of BD in the United Kingdom was 0.8% resulting in a population-level economic burden estimate of £5.1 billion for 2010-2011 or £6.43 billion for 2018-2019.

conclusionsBD is a disease of substantial costs in the United Kingdom with the majority of the economic burden falling outside the health care system in the form of productivity losses and informal care. These costs highly correlate with patient outcomes highlighting further needs for improved treatment efforts into functionality.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderCost of IllnessHumansProspective StudiesSociodemographic FactorsUnited Kingdombipolar disordercostcost-of-illnesseconomic burdenproductivity lossUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID34523820
PMCPMC8553306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.