Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34523418›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

A projectome of the bumblebee central complex.

Marcel Ethan Sayre, Rachel Templin, Johanna Chavez, Julian Kempenaers, Stanley Heinze

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Vector-based navigation in desert ants: the significance of path-integration vectors.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Toward the vector map in insect navigation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Parallel vector memories in the brain of a bee as foundation for flexible navigation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The sky compass network in the brain of the desert locust.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Review
  20. Olfactory navigation in arthropods.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marcel Ethan SayreLund University, Lund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2667-4228
Rachel TemplinQueensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2800-5826
Johanna ChavezLund University, Lund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-1366-1409
Julian KempenaersLund University, Lund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0059-1045
Stanley HeinzeLund University, Lund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8145-3348

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects have evolved diverse and remarkable strategies for navigating in various ecologies all over the world. Regardless of species, insects share the presence of a group of morphologically conserved neuropils known collectively as the central complex (CX). The CX is a navigational center, involved in sensory integration and coordinated motor activity. Despite the fact that our understanding of navigational behavior comes predominantly from ants and bees, most of what we know about the underlying neural circuitry of such behavior comes from work in fruit flies. Here, we aim to close this gap, by providing the first comprehensive map of all major columnar neurons and their projection patterns in the CX of a bee. We find numerous components of the circuit that appear to be highly conserved between the fly and the bee, but also highlight several key differences which are likely to have important functional ramifications.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalConnectomeFlight, AnimalSpatial BehaviorAnimalsBeesDrosophila melanogasterNeural PathwaysNeuropilSpecies Specificitybombus terrestriscentral complexelectron microscopyinsectsnavigationneuroanatomyneuroscience

Identifiers

PMID34523418
PMCPMC8504972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.