Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34523153›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of industrial medicine2021

Health and safety risk perceptions and needs of app-based drivers during COVID-19.

Kerry L Beckman, Lily M Monsey, Megan M Archer, Nicole A Errett, Ann Bostrom, Marissa G Baker

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of industrial medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Platform-Mediated Gig Work and Health: A Scoping Review.American journal of industrial medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Workplace Determinants of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in U.S. Mariners during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kerry L BeckmanDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6014-2735
Lily M MonseyDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3565-7646
Megan M ArcherDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Nicole A ErrettDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8247-8336
Ann BostromEvans School of Public Policy and Governance, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6399-3404
Marissa G BakerDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3136-0490
University of Washington · USWashington State Department of Health · US

Funding

XENOBIOTIC BIOTRANSFORMATION AND DISPOSITIONP30ES007033 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Sheela Sathyanarayana · 1995 to 2026
$42.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007033NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApp-based drivers face work disruptions and infection risk during a pandemic due to the nature of their work, interactions with the public, and lack of workplace protections. Limited occupational health research has focused on their experiences.

methodsWe surveyed 100 app-based drivers in Seattle, WA to assess risk perceptions, supports, and controls received from the company that employs them, sources of trust, stress, job satisfaction, COVID-19 infection status, and how the pandemic had changed their work hours. Data were summarized descriptively and with simple regression models. We complemented this with qualitative interviews to better understand controls and policies enacted during COVID-19, and barriers and facilitators to their implementation.

resultsDrivers expressed very high levels of concern for exposure and infection (86%-97% were "very concerned" for all scenarios). Only 31% of drivers reported receiving an appropriate mask from the company for which they drive. Stress (assessed via PSS-4) was significantly higher in drivers who reported having had COVID-19, and also significantly higher in respondents with lower reported job satisfaction. Informants frequently identified supports such as unemployment benefits and peer outreach among the driver community as ways to ensure that drivers could access available benefits during COVID-19.

conclusionsApp-based drivers received few protections from the company that employed them, and had high fear of exposure and infection at work. There is increased need for health-supportive policies and protections for app-based drivers. The most effective occupational and public health regulations would cover employees who may not have a traditional employer-employee relationship.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAutomobile DrivingCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsOccupational DiseasesOccupational HealthOrganizational CulturePerceptionSafety Managementapp-based driversCOVID-19gig economyvulnerable workersworker stress

Identifiers

PMID34523153
PMCPMC8653178
OpenAlexW3200691667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.