Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34523076›Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2023

Development of Educational Print Materials for Physical Activity in Cancer: Evaluation of Readability and Suitability.

Alice Avancini, Giulia Benato, Daniela Tregnago, Ilaria Trestini, Michele Milella, Massimo Lanza, Sara Pilotto

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Integrating Physical Activity and Family Health Education into Pediatric Oncology Outpatient Care: ATIVAONCO Project.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alice AvanciniMedical Oncology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2439-4799
Giulia BenatoDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Daniela TregnagoMedical Oncology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Ilaria TrestiniMedical Oncology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Michele MilellaMedical Oncology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Massimo LanzaDepartment of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Sara PilottoMedical Oncology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. sara.pilotto@univr.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Educational health materials may be important tools to increase physical activity in cancer patients. Nevertheless, most of the available resources regarding physical activity for cancer patients were found not suitable, had a low grade of readability, and thus, represent a significant barrier to behavior change. To date, little data about development criteria and evaluation of physical activity resources for cancer before their spread exist. The purposes of this study were (i) to describe the development of a physical activity guidebook designed for cancer patients and (ii) to test its readability and suitability. The guidebook was developed through multi-step passages, including group discussions, a literature review, identification of a motivational theory, and using previous research on exercise preferences, barriers, and facilitators to target the information. Two validated formulae were used to assess the readability, whereas thirty-four judges completed the Suitability of Assessment Materials questionnaire to evaluate the suitability of the guidebook. The guidebook was found readable for patients having at least a primary education, and the judges scored it as "superior" material. Our guidebook, following a rigorous method in the development phase, was considered to be suitable and readable. Further evaluations through clinical trials could investigate its effectiveness for behavior change and its impact on cancer patients.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyNeoplasmsComprehensionExerciseHealth EducationHumansInternetCancerExercisePatient educational bookletPhysical activity promotionSuitability assessment

Identifiers

PMID34523076
PMCPMC9852108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.