ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2022
Can preoperative lacrimal endoscopic evaluation change the paradigm of conventional lacrimal surgery?
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative lacrimal endoscopic evaluation (LEE) of lacrimal duct system (LDS).
designRetrospective comparative case series
methodsFrom March 2016 to February 2020, the charts of patients chosen to undergo endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EDCR) or silicone tube intubation (STI) were reviewed retrospectively. Group 1 included patients that underwent EDCR, and group 2 included patients that underwent STI. Preoperative LEE was performed for all patients. In group 1, we compared the functional success rate for patients who had been converted to STI with the patients who had undergone EDCR. In group 2, we compared the functional success rate of STI with those who had had STI without LEE.
resultsIn group 1, 19 (54.3%) eyes were converted to STI following LEE, and the functional success rate was 84.2%, which is not significantly different from that of the EDCR group following LEE (p = 0.608). The functional success rate of EDCR without LEE was not different from that of STI following LEE (p = 1.000). In group 2, five eyes (26.3%) were converted to EDCR following LEE. The group undergoing STI following LEE showed a significantly higher functional success rate (95.7%) than the group without LEE (66.6%, p = 0.023).
conclusionPreoperative LEE enables direct visualization of the LDS and helps to obtain more accurate diagnosis. This allows for the best surgical option based on LEE findings, which can contribute to better results. Therefore, LEE would be expected to change the paradigm of the classical management of LDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.