Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34523047›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2022

Good subjective outcome and low risk of revision surgery with a novel customized metal implant for focal femoral chondral lesions at a follow-up after a minimum of 5 years.

Mohanad Al-Bayati, Nicolas Martinez-Carranza, David Roberts, Magnus Högström, Anders Stålman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Mohanad Al-BayatiOrthopedic Department, Skövde Hospital, Skövde, Sweden.
Nicolas Martinez-CarranzaDepartment of Orthopedics, Institution of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
David RobertsOrtho Center Skåne and Department of Orthopedics, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Magnus HögströmDepartment of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Sports Medicine Umeå and Orthopedics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Anders StålmanMMK, Stockholm Sports Trauma Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden. anders.stalman@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6261-2024
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SESkåne University Hospital · SESophiahemmet Hospital · SEUmeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposePatients with focal cartilage lesions experience functional impairment. Results for biological treatments in the middle-aged patient is poor. Previous studies with focal prosthetic inlay resurfacing have shown a higher risk of conversion to total knee replacement at mid-term follow-up. A novel customized implant (Episealer, Episurf, Stockholm, Sweden) has been proposed to improve implant positioning and survival. The primary objective was to assess subjective-, objective function and implant survival at a minimum of five years after surgery. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe inclusion criteria were patients aged 30-65 years with symptomatic focal chondral defects in the medial femoral condyle, International Cartilage Research Society grade 3 or 4 and failed conservative or surgical treatment. Minimum follow-up of 5 years. Clinical and radiologic assessments were made. Patient-reported outcome measurements at the latest follow-up were compared with the baseline data for the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the EuroQoL (EQ-5D), the Tegner Activity Scale and a Visual Analog Scale of pain (VAS 0-10).

resultsTen patients with the mean follow-up period of 75 months (60-86 months, SD 10) were included. Signs of osteoarthritis were seen in one patient (Ahlbäck 1). No cases with revision to knee replacement. VAS for pain and KOOS showed improvements that reached significance for VAS (p ≤ 0.001) and the KOOS subscores Pain (p = 0.01), ADL (p = 0.003), Sport and Recreation (p = 0.024) and Quality of Life (p = 0.003).

conclusionA good subjective outcome, a low risk of progression to degenerative changes and the need for subsequent surgery were seen at the mid-term follow-up with this customized focal knee-resurfacing implant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective case series, level 4.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularKnee ProsthesisOsteoarthritisFemurFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointMetalsMiddle AgedPainQuality of LifeReoperationTreatment OutcomeMetalsFocal cartilage injuriesKneeOsteochondral injuryProsthetic inlay resurfacing

Identifiers

PMID34523047
PMCPMC9474357
OpenAlexW3200326644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.