Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34522910›Full record

Trial reportThe lancet. Healthy longevity2021

Computerised cognitive remediation to enhance mobility in older adults: a single-blind, single-centre, randomised trial.

Joe Verghese, Jeannette R Mahoney, Emmeline Ayers, Anne Ambrose, Cuiling Wang, Roee Holtzer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The lancet. Healthy longevity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02567227 (Cognitive Intervention to Improve Simple and Complex Walking), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02567227 nacompletednot on this map

Cognitive Intervention to Improve Simple and Complex Walking

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlbert Einstein College of MedicineRan2016 to 2020Enrolled383ConditionsMobility Limitation, Motor Activity, Difficulty Walking, Cognitive Ability GeneralArmsCognitive Remediation, Active Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dual cognitive and mobility impairments and future dementia - Setting a research agenda.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Cognitive training, mobility, and everyday life.The lancet. Healthy longevity · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joe Verghese(Prof J Verghese MBBS, J R Mahoney PhD, E Ayers MPH, C Wang PhD, Prof R Holtzer PhD), (Prof J Verghese), (A Ambrose MD), (C Wang), (Prof R Holtzer).
Jeannette R Mahoney(Prof J Verghese MBBS, J R Mahoney PhD, E Ayers MPH, C Wang PhD, Prof R Holtzer PhD), (Prof J Verghese), (A Ambrose MD), (C Wang), (Prof R Holtzer).
Emmeline Ayers(Prof J Verghese MBBS, J R Mahoney PhD, E Ayers MPH, C Wang PhD, Prof R Holtzer PhD), (Prof J Verghese), (A Ambrose MD), (C Wang), (Prof R Holtzer).
Anne Ambrose(Prof J Verghese MBBS, J R Mahoney PhD, E Ayers MPH, C Wang PhD, Prof R Holtzer PhD), (Prof J Verghese), (A Ambrose MD), (C Wang), (Prof R Holtzer).
Cuiling Wang(Prof J Verghese MBBS, J R Mahoney PhD, E Ayers MPH, C Wang PhD, Prof R Holtzer PhD), (Prof J Verghese), (A Ambrose MD), (C Wang), (Prof R Holtzer).
Roee Holtzer(Prof J Verghese MBBS, J R Mahoney PhD, E Ayers MPH, C Wang PhD, Prof R Holtzer PhD), (Prof J Verghese), (A Ambrose MD), (C Wang), (Prof R Holtzer).
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USYeshiva University · US

Funding

Cognitive intervention to improve simple and complex walkingR01AG050448 · NIA · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI HOLTZER, ROEE, VERGHESE, JOE · 2015 to 2019
$4.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG050448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDecline in executive functions and related cognitive processes is associated with mobility decline, and these functions might be amenable to cognitive remediation. This study aimed to examine whether a computerised cognitive remediation programme would improve walking in adults aged 70 years and older.

methodsThis single-blind, randomised trial at one academic centre in the USA evaluated the efficacy of an 8-week computerised programme (also known as brain games) of progressive intensity and complexity to improve walking in older adults at high-risk for mobility disability. Inclusion criteria included being 70 years or older; ambulatory; and at high-risk for mobility disability, defined using a cutscore of nine or less (frail range) on the Short Physical Performance Battery and a walking speed of 100 cm/s or less. Individuals with dementia, acute or terminal medical illnesses, recent or planned surgery affecting mobility, mobility limitations solely due to musculoskeletal limitation or pain that prevented them from completing mobility tests, and those who were nursing home residents were excluded. Participants were block randomised (1:1; block size 12 and no stratification) to the intervention group or the control group (low complexity computer games and health education classes). Primary outcomes were change in walking speed at normal pace and walking while talking conditions assessed from baseline to 8 weeks post-intervention by investigators who were masked to group assignment. Groups were compared using the intention-to-treat principle with linear mixed models adjusted for confounders. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrails.gov, NCT02567227.

findingsBetween March 1, 2016, and March 12, 2020, 383 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. After randomisation, 11 (3%) patients were diagnosed with dementia. 372 (97%; 271 [73%] women) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The mean age of participants was 77·0 years [SD 5·6]). 183 (49·2%) participants were Black and 62 (16·7%) were Hispanic. 314 (93%) of the target 338 completers had finished the intervention when the trial was terminated due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Although there were significant within-group improvements in both groups after the 8-week intervention, there was no significant difference in normal walking speed (-1·03 cm/s [SD 1·30]; 95% CI -3·60 to 1·54) and walking while talking conditions (0·59 cm/s [SD 1·61]; 95% CI -2·59 to 3·76) between the intervention and control groups. Similarly, within-group, but no between-group, differences were seen on executive function tests and physical function. There were no severe adverse events related to interventions.

interpretationComputerised cognitive remediation improved walking in adults aged 70 years and older at high-risk for mobility disability, but improvements were not significantly greater compared with an active control. Although our findings corroborate the within-group improvements on cognition and mobility reported in previous pilot clinical trials, future studies are required to determine the optimal dose, frequency, intensity, and content of computerised cognitive remediation programmes.

fundingNational Institute on Aging.

Indexed as

Cognitive RemediationCOVID-19DementiaAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMalePandemicsSingle-Blind Method

Identifiers

PMID34522910
PMCPMC8437150
OpenAlexW3198191841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.