Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34522895›Full record

ArticleSN computer science2021

Pandemic Penetration: Factors for Measurement.

V S Anirudh Chebolu, Arkajit Datta, N A B Sankar Chebolu, Kovvur Ram Mohan Rao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SN computer science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

V S Anirudh CheboluDepartment of Information Technology, Vasavi College of Engineering, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3223-1121
Arkajit DattaSCOPE, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
N A B Sankar CheboluCAIR, DRDO, Hyderabad, India.
Kovvur Ram Mohan RaoDepartment of Information Technology, Vasavi College of Engineering, Hyderabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current Covid-19 Pandemic has thrown an immense challenge to the entire humanity. This pandemic spread across the entire globe is causing physical, economical, political, psychological and social stress. World Health Organization (WHO) is giving advisories to the nations from time to time in handling the pandemic. Different countries and WHO are publishing various statistics like the number of infected patients, number of recovered patients and number of deaths daily. There is a necessity to devise a metric, which we refer as Pandemic Penetration Index (PPI), to find out the intensity of the pandemic's penetration in different countries. This metric will not only help the policy makers to formulate the pandemic handling plans, but also acts as an apt tool for international organizations such as WHO, to provide nation-specific advisories. The effectiveness of the metric will depend on various individual factors that are to be considered, its measurement and weightage assigned to individual factors. Objective of the current study is to explore, estimate and establish various essential constituent individual factors for deriving proper PPI value, based on the current COVID 19 data.

Indexed as

COVID19FactorsMetricPandemic penetration

Identifiers

PMID34522895
PMCPMC8428204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.