Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34522884›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2021

Two types of phonological reading impairment in stroke aphasia.

Jonathan Vivian Dickens, Andrew T DeMarco, Candace M van der Stelt, Sarah F Snider, Elizabeth H Lacey, John D Medaglia, Rhonda B Friedman, Peter E Turkeltaub

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rapid auditory and phonemic processing relies on the left planum temporale.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan Vivian DickensDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8874-5442
Andrew T DeMarcoDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Candace M van der SteltDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Sarah F SniderDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Elizabeth H LaceyDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
John D MedagliaDrexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8372-0139
Rhonda B FriedmanDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Peter E TurkeltaubDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Georgetown University · USDrexel University · USMedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital · US

Funding

Contributions of spared brain structures and connections to aphasia recoveryR01DC014960 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI TURKELTAUB, PETER ETHAN · 2017 to 2021
$4.0M
Mapping the Neurocognitive Architecture of ReadingF30DC018215 · NIDCD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI DICKENS, JONATHAN VIVIAN · 2019 to 2023
$193k
NIDCD NIH HHS F30 DC018215NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alexia is common in the context of aphasia. It is widely agreed that damage to phonological and semantic systems not specific to reading causes co-morbid alexia and aphasia. Studies of alexia to date have only examined phonology and semantics as singular processes or axes of impairment, typically in the context of stereotyped alexia syndromes. However, phonology, in particular, is known to rely on subprocesses, including sensory-phonological processing, motor-phonological processing, and sensory-motor integration. Moreover, many people with stroke aphasia demonstrate mild or mixed patterns of reading impairment that do not fit neatly with one syndrome. This cross-sectional study tested whether the hallmark symptom of phonological reading impairment, the lexicality effect, emerges from damage to a specific subprocess of phonology in stroke patients not selected for alexia syndromes. Participants were 30 subjects with left-hemispheric stroke and 37 age- and education-matched controls. A logistic mixed-effects model tested whether post-stroke impairments in sensory phonology, motor phonology, or sensory-motor integration modulated the effect of item lexicality on patient accuracy in reading aloud. Support vector regression voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping localized brain regions necessary for reading and non-orthographic phonological processing. Additionally, a novel support vector regression structural connectome-symptom mapping method identified the contribution of both lesioned and spared but disconnected, brain regions to reading accuracy and non-orthographic phonological processing. Specifically, we derived whole-brain structural connectomes using constrained spherical deconvolution-based probabilistic tractography and identified lesioned connections based on comparisons between patients and controls. Logistic mixed-effects regression revealed that only greater motor-phonological impairment related to lower accuracy reading aloud pseudowords versus words. Impaired sensory-motor integration was related to lower overall accuracy in reading aloud. No relationship was identified between sensory-phonological impairment and reading accuracy. Voxel-based and structural connectome lesion-symptom mapping revealed that lesioned and disconnected left ventral precentral gyrus related to both greater motor-phonological impairment and lower sublexical reading accuracy. In contrast, lesioned and disconnected left temporoparietal cortex is related to both impaired sensory-motor integration and reduced overall reading accuracy. These results clarify that at least two dissociable phonological processes contribute to the pattern of reading impairment in aphasia. First, impaired sensory-motor integration, caused by lesions disrupting the left temporoparietal cortex and its structural connections, non-selectively reduces accuracy in reading aloud. Second, impaired motor-phonological processing, caused at least partially by lesions disrupting left ventral premotor cortex and structural connections, selectively reduces sublexical reading accuracy. These results motivate a revised cognitive model of reading aloud that incorporates a sensory-motor phonological circuit.

Indexed as

alexiaaphasialesion-symptom mappingstrokestructural connectivity

Identifiers

PMID34522884
PMCPMC8432944
OpenAlexW3198149858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.