Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34522676›Full record

ArticleAnnals of maxillofacial surgery

Rehabilitation of Auricular Defect with Implant-Retained Auricular Prosthesis - A Case Report.

Dushyant Chauhan, I D Roy, M Viswamnara, Ashish Thakur, Ravi Athwale

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of maxillofacial surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dushyant ChauhanDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Army Dental Center R&R, Delhi, India.
I D RoyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Army Dental Center R&R, Delhi, India.
M ViswamnaraDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Army Dental Center R&R, Delhi, India.
Ashish ThakurDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Army Dental Center R&R, Delhi, India.
Ravi AthwaleDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Army Dental Center R&R, Delhi, India.
Indian Army · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleMaxillofacial defect is of great concern physically, emotionally, and psychologically for a patient. However, it is an even bigger challenge for a team attempting rehabilitation, as a crucial decision has to be made between surgical approach and/or prosthetic rehabilitation. However, if both are combined, it will result in best of esthetics and function with ease of maintainance, resulting in a sucessful rehabilitation. This case report represents a case of auricular defect rehabilitated with a combination of implants and bar-retained silicone prosthesis. PATIENT CONCERN: A 38-year-old male patient with right auricular defect reported with the main concern of esthetic rehabilitation of a lost part of the external ear. DIAGNOSIS: With through evaluation and examination, a diagnosis of acquired partial auricular defect of the right side secondary to trauma was established. TREATMENT: An implant-retained auricular prosthesis was planned for this case. Surgically, three intraoral implants were placed in the mastoid bone, and after healing, bar framework was fabricated and attached. Finally, silicone prosthesis was fabricated and delivered to the patient. OUTCOME: A successful rehabilitation was carried out in this case using implants and bar attachment for retention of the silicone prosthesis. This prosthesis provided excellent retention and restored the appearance and confidence of the patient. TAKE-AWAY LESSONS: Rehabilitation of the auricular defect can be carried out with surgical approach, which involves multiple surgeries, and still, the results may not be esthetically favorable. Prosthetic rehabilitation is an option, but retention is generally a hindrance. However, implant-retained prosthesis has really paved a way for rehabilitation of the maxillofacial defect esthetically and more reliably. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CT) can be used for planning and evaluation instead of CT, which will save the patient from a lot of radiation exposure. Hence, in the maxillofacial defect, attempts should be made to explore the option of implant-retained prosthesis.

Indexed as

Auricular prosthesisimplant-retained silicone prosthesismaxillofacial implants

Identifiers

PMID34522676
PMCPMC8407634
OpenAlexW3183590218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.