Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34522582›Full record

ReviewActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B2021

Matthew Behr, Jing Zhou, Bing Xu, Hongwei Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cas12a chRDNA-mediatedMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dual-functional nanoplatform for simultaneous degradation of circRNAJournal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2026
    Article
  6. Nanocarrier-mediated CRISPR-Cas delivery: a novel approach against antibiotic-resistant superbugs.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew BehrDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy-Boston, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Jing ZhouDepartment of Endocrinology, Tangshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tangshan 063000, China.
Bing XuDepartment of Chemistry, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454, USA.
Hongwei ZhangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy-Boston, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within less than a decade since its inception, CRISPR-Cas9-based genome editing has been rapidly advanced to human clinical trials in multiple disease areas. Although it is highly anticipated that this revolutionary technology will bring novel therapeutic modalities to many diseases by precisely manipulating cellular DNA sequences, the low efficiency of

Indexed as

AAVCas9CRISPRGenome editing therapyIn vivoLentivirusLNPNanoparticle

Identifiers

PMID34522582
PMCPMC8424283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.