ArticleCureus2021
Performance Review of Intelligent Guidance Robot at the Outpatient Clinic Setting.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Review
- Knowledge and attitudes toward artificial intelligence in nursing among various categories of professionals in China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Optimizing Voice Recognition Informatic Robots for Effective Communication in Outpatient Settings.Cureus · 2023Article
- Assistive robotic systems in nursing care: a scoping review.BMC nursing · 2023Article
- Assessing usability of intelligent guidance chatbots in Chinese hospitals: Cross-sectional study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study analyzes the implementation of a mobile intelligent guidance robot to roam hospital outpatient services and discusses the application's effect and experience. The data consist of human-robot verbal communications in November 2019 to analyze and evaluate the application according to the service volume, accuracy, and functions. Statistically, the accuracy of correct output by the intelligent guidance robot when answering related questions in outpatient services was significantly lower than the manufacturer's claimed expected accuracy. Furthermore, the utilization review of the intelligent guidance robot was surprisingly unexpected. Therefore, applying an intelligent guidance robot is not limited to merely providing directions and navigation functions but can be valuable in improving public health literacy. Nevertheless, the hospital should meet patients' needs by expanding intelligent guidance robots' service functions and increasing patient experience to finetune the application through further experiments and design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.