ArticleCureus2021
Outcomes of Simulation in Resident Imaging-Guided Breast Biopsy Training.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction of Low-Cost Simulators for Training in Minimally Invasive Breast Procedures.European journal of breast health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction We evaluate diagnostic radiology residents' perceptions of an ultrasound-guided and stereotactic breast biopsy simulator used at an academic medical center. This simulator is low-cost and easily reproducible. We aim to understand if this simulator improves residents' self-reported confidence in performing breast biopsy procedures on live patients. Methods Twenty-eight diagnostic radiology residents were instructed in how to perform ultrasound-guided breast biopsies and stereotactic breast biopsies using real biopsy and imaging equipment, but with tissue models in lieu of live persons. The hands-on experience was preceded by a didactic lecture. The ultrasound-guided tissue model was created with blueberries that were inserted in tofu, and the stereotactic tissue model was created by placing crushed calcium carbonate tablets into cored eggplant. Residents were asked to fill out a survey before and after participating in the simulation, where they self-reported their confidence level at performing ultrasound-guided and stereotactic breast biopsies. Results Twenty-eight diagnostic radiology residents participated in the simulation. All residents completed the pre-simulation survey and of these residents, twenty-one completed the post-simulation survey. Prior to the simulation residents reported a median confidence level of 3.5 out of 10 in performing ultrasound-guided breast biopsies, and a median confidence level of 1.0 out of 10 in performing stereotactic-guided breast biopsies. After the simulation, residents reported a median confidence level of 7.0 out of 10 in performing ultrasound-guided breast biopsies, and a median confidence level of 3.0 out of 10 in performing stereotactic-guided breast biopsies. Increases in resident confidence level were statistically significant for both biopsy types (p < 0.01). Conclusion Simulated biopsies can increase the confidence of diagnostic radiology residents that are learning to perform breast biopsies before they perform real biopsies on live patients. Providing simulation training and thereby improving resident confidence may help reduce physician error and patient harm due to poor biopsy techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.