Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34522442›Full record

ArticleImmune network2021

Comparison of Antibody and T Cell Responses Induced by Single Doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BNT162b2 Vaccines.

Ji Yeun Kim, Seongman Bae, Soonju Park, Ji-Soo Kwon, So Yun Lim, Ji Young Park, Hye Hee Cha, Mi Hyun Seo, Hyun Jung Lee, Nakyung Lee and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immune network, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation of the T cell and B cell response following the administration of COVID-19 vaccines in Korea.Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ji Yeun KimDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6955-6427
Seongman BaeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6375-3657
Soonju ParkInstitut Pasteur Korea, Seongnam 13488, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6694-320X
Ji-Soo KwonDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6945-6100
So Yun LimDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.
Ji Young ParkDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.
Hye Hee ChaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2943-3059
Mi Hyun SeoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.
Hyun Jung LeeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.
Nakyung LeeInstitut Pasteur Korea, Seongnam 13488, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9496-5994
Jinyeong HeoInstitut Pasteur Korea, Seongnam 13488, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8180-9658
David ShumInstitut Pasteur Korea, Seongnam 13488, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2349-5670
Youngmee JeeInstitut Pasteur Korea, Seongnam 13488, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5369-6628
Sung-Han KimDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6596-8253
Ulsan College · KRInstitut Pasteur Korea · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are limited data directly comparing humoral and T cell responses to the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BNT162b2 vaccines. We compared Ab and T cell responses after first doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vs. BNT162b2 vaccines. We enrolled healthcare workers who received ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or BNT162b2 vaccine in Seoul, Korea. Anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) S1 protein-specific IgG Abs (S1-IgG), neutralizing Abs (NT Abs), and SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell response were evaluated before vaccination and at 1-wk intervals for 3 wks after vaccination. A total of 76 persons, comprising 40 injected with the ChAdOx1 vaccine and 36 injected with the BNT162b2 vaccine, participated in this study. At 3 wks after vaccination, the mean levels (±SD) of S1-IgG and NT Abs in the BNT162b2 participants were significantly higher than in the ChAdOx1 participants (S1-IgG, 14.03±7.20 vs. 6.28±8.87, p<0.0001; NT Ab, 183.1±155.6 vs. 116.6±116.2, p=0.035), respectively. However, the mean values of the T cell responses in the 2 groups were comparable after 2 wks. The humoral immune response after the 1st dose of BNT162b2 developed faster and was stronger than after the 1st dose of ChAdOx1. However, the T cell responses to BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 were similar.

Indexed as

Antibody responseBNT162b2 vaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccineImmunogenicityT cell response

Identifiers

PMID34522442
PMCPMC8410992
OpenAlexW3196493325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.