Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34522370›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

Tree recruitment is determined by stand structure and shade tolerance with uncertain role of climate and water relations.

Yannek Käber, Peter Meyer, Jonas Stillhard, Emiel De Lombaerde, Jürgen Zell, Golo Stadelmann, Harald Bugmann, Christof Bigler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Yannek KäberForest Ecology Department of Environmental Systems Science Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7041-9849
Peter MeyerDepartment Forest Nature Conservation Northwest German Forest Research Institute Münden Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4200-4993
Jonas StillhardForest Resources and Management Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL Birmensdorf Switzerland.
Emiel De LombaerdeForest & Nature Lab Department of Environment Faculty of Bioscience Engineering Ghent University Ghent Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0050-2735
Jürgen ZellForest Resources and Management Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL Birmensdorf Switzerland.
Golo StadelmannForest Resources and Management Swiss Federal Research Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL Birmensdorf Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6466-0161
Harald BugmannForest Ecology Department of Environmental Systems Science Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4233-0094
Christof BiglerForest Ecology Department of Environmental Systems Science Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3757-6356
ETH Zurich · CHSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research · CHGhent University · BENordwestdeutsche Forstliche Versuchsanstalt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tree regeneration is a key process for long-term forest dynamics, determining changes in species composition and shaping successional trajectories. While tree regeneration is a highly stochastic process, tree regeneration studies often cover narrow environmental gradients only, focusing on specific forest types or species in distinct regions. Thus, the larger-scale effects of temperature, water availability, and stand structure on tree regeneration are poorly understood.We investigated these effects in respect of tree recruitment (in-growth) along wide environmental gradients using forest inventory data from Flanders (Belgium), northwestern Germany, and Switzerland covering more than 40 tree species. We employed generalized linear mixed models to capture the abundance of tree recruitment in response to basal area, stem density, shade casting ability of a forest stand as well as site-specific degree-day sum (temperature), water balance, and plant-available water holding capacity. We grouped tree species to facilitate comparisons between species with different levels of tolerance to shade and drought.Basal area and shade casting ability of the overstory had generally a negative impact on tree recruitment, but the effects differed between levels of shade tolerance of tree recruitment in all study regions. Recruitment rates of very shade-tolerant species were positively affected by shade casting ability. Stem density and summer warmth (degree-day sum) had similar effects on all tree species and successional strategies. Water-related variables revealed a high degree of uncertainty and did not allow for general conclusions. All variables had similar effects independent of the varying diameter thresholds for tree recruitment in the different data sets.

Indexed as

drought toleranceforest ecosystemsforest reservesnational forest inventoriesplant population and community dynamicsshade tolerancetree recruitmenttree regeneration

Identifiers

PMID34522370
PMCPMC8427579
OpenAlexW3195362813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.