ArticleChemical science2021
Predicting potentially hazardous chemical reactions using an explainable neural network.
Article in Chemical science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning Multidimensional Electronegativity of Selected Atom Types in Organic Molecules Using Graph Neural Networks.ACS omega · 2025Article
- A Perspective on Foundation Models in Chemistry.JACS Au · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting potentially dangerous chemical reactions is a critical task for laboratory safety. However, a traditional experimental investigation of reaction conditions for possible hazardous or explosive byproducts entails substantial time and cost, for which machine learning prediction could accelerate the process and help detailed experimental investigations. Several machine learning models have been developed which allow the prediction of major chemical reaction products with reasonable accuracy. However, these methods may not present sufficiently high accuracy for the prediction of hazardous products which particularly requires a low false negative result for laboratory safety in order not to miss any dangerous reactions. In this work, we propose an explainable artificial intelligence model that can predict the formation of hazardous reaction products in a binary classification fashion. The reactant molecules are transformed into substructure-encoded fingerprints and then fed into a convolutional neural network to make the binary decision of the chemical reaction. The proposed model shows a false negative rate of 0.09, which can be compared with 0.47-0.66 using the existing main product prediction models. To provide explanations for what substructures of the given reactant molecules are important to make a decision for target hazardous product formation, we apply an input attribution method, layer-wise relevance propagation, which computes the contributions of individual inputs per input data. The computed attributions indeed match some of the existing chemical intuitions and mechanisms, and also offer a way to analyze possible data-imbalance issues of the current predictions based on relatively small positive datasets. We expect that the proposed hazardous product prediction model will be complementary to existing main product prediction models and experimental investigations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.