Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34522241›Full record

ArticlePharmacy practice

Participants' perceptions of a residency teaching certificate program: the quality, impact and benefits.

Lindsey Peters, Brittany Long, Emily Eddy, Kayli Kuhn, Chelsea Huppert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Impact of resident teaching mentors on teaching certificate program outcomes.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lindsey PetersPharmD, BCPS. Associate Professor of Pharmacy Practice. Raabe College of Pharmacy, Ohio Northern University. Ada, OH (United States). l-peters@onu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7089-8037
Brittany LongPharmD, BCACP. Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice. Raabe College of Pharmacy, Ohio Northern University. Ada, OH (United States). b-brock@onu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2374-9041
Emily EddyPharmD, BCACP, BC-ADM. Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice. Raabe College of Pharmacy, Ohio Northern University. Ada, OH (United States). e-eddy.1@onu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2949-8987
Kayli KuhnRaabe College of Pharmacy, Ohio Northern University. Ada, OH (United States). k-kuhn.1@onu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6768-6460
Chelsea HuppertRaabe College of Pharmacy, Ohio Northern University. Ada, OH (United States). c-huppert@onu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2937-9969

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, there are no accreditation requirements for pharmacy resident teaching certificate programs (RTCPs) but rather suggested guidelines and documents for individual programs to follow. RTCP curriculums are often "handed-down" from past personnel and vary based on individual interpretation. Quality improvement may be overlooked when programs do not report to governing bodies.

objectiveThe primary objective of this quality improvement project was threefold: 1) to identify past RTCP participants' perceptions regarding program seminars, activities, and requirements; 2) to determine the short-term and long-term impact on participant careers and interaction with learners; and 3) to improve the program to meet participants' needs.

methodsA 25 item Qualtrics survey was sent to 93 past pharmacy residents who completed the RTCP. Delivery of the survey was confirmed to 89 previous residents. Participants provided consent and were given 12 days to complete the survey. Data was collected and coded by the research team independently.

resultsThe participants hold positions in a variety of roles, with 68.3% of participants currently holding a non-academia position. The top five most beneficial activities during the RTCP were: giving a large room lecture, facilitating small group learning, developing test questions, delivering professional CE, and meeting with their teaching mentor. Most seminar topics were beneficial to residents during the RTCP, with over two-thirds of the topics (n=23) found beneficial by at least 90% of the participants. A total of 92.9% of respondents said that the most beneficial aspect of having an assigned mentor was the teaching advice and feedback provided.

conclusionsThe perceptions and beliefs of past RTCP participants were obtained regarding how beneficial the programming, activities, and mentorship offered were during and after RTCP completion. Quality improvement ideas from this work include redistribution of time in seminars compared to hands-on activities, the adoption of tracks or concentrations within the RTCP, and the creation of mentor training and development.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducation, PharmacyFeedbackInternship and ResidencyLearningMentorsPerceptionPharmacistsPharmacy ResidenciesQuality ImprovementSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34522241
PMCPMC8412891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.