ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2021
Combining Resampling Strategies and Ensemble Machine Learning Methods to Enhance Prediction of Neonates with a Low Apgar Score After Induction of Labor in Northern Tanzania.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Data science and artificial intelligence for maternal, newborn and child health: scoping review and thematic analysis.BMC public health · 2025Article
- XGBMUT: Predicting the Functional Impact of Missense Mutations Using an Extreme Gradient Boost Classifier.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Prediction of low Apgar score at five minutes following labor induction intervention in vaginal deliveries: machine learning approach for imbalanced data at a tertiary hospital in North Tanzania.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe goal of this study was to establish the most efficient boosting method in predicting neonatal low Apgar scores following labor induction intervention and to assess whether resampling strategies would improve the predictive performance of the selected boosting algorithms.
methodsA total of 7716 singleton births delivered from 2000 to 2015 were analyzed. Cesarean deliveries following labor induction, deliveries with abnormal presentation, and deliveries with missing Apgar score or delivery mode information were excluded. We examined the effect of resampling approaches or data preprocessing on predicting low Apgar scores, specifically the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE), borderline-SMOTE, and the random undersampling (RUS) technique. Sensitivity, specificity, precision, area under receiver operating curve (AUROC), F-score, positive predicted values (PPV), negative predicted values (NPV) and accuracy of the three (3) boosting-based ensemble methods were used to evaluate their discriminative ability. The ensemble learning models tested include adoptive boosting (AdaBoost), gradient boosting (GB) and extreme gradient boosting method (XGBoost).
resultsThe prevalence of low (<7) Apgar scores was 9.5% (n = 733). The prediction models performed nearly similar in their baseline mode. Following the application of resampling techniques, borderline-SMOTE significantly improved the predictive performance of all the boosting-based ensemble methods under observation in terms of sensitivity, F1-score, AUROC and PPV.
conclusionPolicymakers, healthcare informaticians and neonatologists should consider implementing data preprocessing strategies when predicting a neonatal outcome with imbalanced data to enhance efficiency. The process may be more effective when borderline-SMOTE technique is deployed on the selected ensemble classifiers. However, future research may focus on testing additional resampling techniques, performing feature engineering, variable selection and optimizing further the ensemble learning hyperparameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.