Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34522088›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2021

The Effect of Social Support on Treatment Adherence in Hypertension in China.

Jingjing Pan, Bin Hu, Lian Wu, Yarong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jingjing PanDepartment of Pharmacy, Xi'an People's Hospital (Xi'an Fourth Hospital), Xi'an, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-2762-5222
Bin HuDepartment of Pharmacy, Xi'an People's Hospital (Xi'an Fourth Hospital), Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
Lian WuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Xi'an People's Hospital (Xi'an Fourth Hospital), Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
Yarong LiDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Xi'an Medical University, Xian, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTreatment nonadherence is a major problem in the management of hypertension. There are many factors influencing the treatment adherence of hypertensive patients. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of social support on the treatment adherence in hypertension in China. PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 453 patients with hypertension hospitalized in a tertiary hospital in Xi'an, China were invited to participate in this cross-sectional study. Data were collected by "modified Chinese Hill-Bone compliance to high blood pressure therapy scale" and "Chinese Family Support Scale".

resultsIt was found that 31.1% of patients were adherent with their antihypertensive treatments. Gender, duration of antihypertensive drug used, number of antihypertensive drugs used and social support were independently associated with hypertensive treatment adherence. Social support was strongly and positively associated with the hypertensive treatment adherence (

conclusionTreatment adherence of patients with hypertension was found to increase positively as their social support increased. In addition to the support given to patients from nuclear family members, other social support especially professional agencies and community organizations should also be promoted and strengthened.

Indexed as

Chinahypertensionsocial supporttreatment adherence

Identifiers

PMID34522088
PMCPMC8434919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.