Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34522043›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2021

Neural tuning and representational geometry.

Nikolaus Kriegeskorte, Xue-Xin Wei

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 123 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed, 194 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Making models disagree to learn how brains compute.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Identifiability of Bayesian models of perception.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Loss of neuronal population organization links pathology to behavior in a model of Alzheimer's disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Artificial neural manifolds.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The human language processing system straightens natural speech.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The cost of efficiency in flexible neural representations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nikolaus Kriegeskorte *Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. nk2765@columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7433-9005
Xue-Xin Wei *Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. weixx@utexas.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2761-477X
Columbia University · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central goal of neuroscience is to understand the representations formed by brain activity patterns and their connection to behaviour. The classic approach is to investigate how individual neurons encode stimuli and how their tuning determines the fidelity of the neural representation. Tuning analyses often use the Fisher information to characterize the sensitivity of neural responses to small changes of the stimulus. In recent decades, measurements of large populations of neurons have motivated a complementary approach, which focuses on the information available to linear decoders. The decodable information is captured by the geometry of the representational patterns in the multivariate response space. Here we review neural tuning and representational geometry with the goal of clarifying the relationship between them. The tuning induces the geometry, but different sets of tuned neurons can induce the same geometry. The geometry determines the Fisher information, the mutual information and the behavioural performance of an ideal observer in a range of psychophysical tasks. We argue that future studies can benefit from considering both tuning and geometry to understand neural codes and reveal the connections between stimuli, brain activity and behaviour.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalModels, TheoreticalAnimalsBrainHumansNeurons

Identifiers

PMID34522043
OpenAlexW3200345763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.