Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34521884›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

An observational and Mendelian randomisation study on vitamin D and COVID-19 risk in UK Biobank.

Xue Li, Jos van Geffen, Michiel van Weele, Xiaomeng Zhang, Yazhou He, Xiangrui Meng, Maria Timofeeva, Harry Campbell, Malcolm Dunlop, Lina Zgaga and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Beneficial health effects of ultraviolet radiation: expert review and conference report.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The role of vitamin D receptor and IL-6 in COVID-19.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Vitamin D and COVID-19-Revisited.Journal of internal medicine · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. The Role of Vitamin D in Supporting Health in the COVID-19 Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Xue LiSchool of Public Health and the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jos van GeffenRoyal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), De Bilt, The Netherlands.
Michiel van WeeleRoyal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), De Bilt, The Netherlands.
Xiaomeng ZhangCentre for Global Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Yazhou HeCentre for Global Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Xiangrui MengVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 10084, China.
Maria TimofeevaColon Cancer Genetics Group, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre and Medical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Medical Research Council Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Harry CampbellCentre for Global Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Malcolm DunlopColon Cancer Genetics Group, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre and Medical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Medical Research Council Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Lina ZgagaDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland. zgagal@tcd.ie.
Evropi TheodoratouCentre for Global Health, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. e.theodoratou@ed.ac.uk.
University of Edinburgh · GBEdinburgh Cancer Research · GBRoyal Netherlands Meteorological Institute · NLMedical Research Council · GBSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNTrinity College Dublin · IEVanke (China) · CN

Funding

Cancer Research UK 12076Cancer Research UK 18927Cancer Research UK C31250/A22804Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_PC_U127527198Medical Research Council MC_QA137853Medical Research Council MC_U127527198Medical Research Council MC_UU_00007/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing body of evidence suggests that vitamin D deficiency has been associated with an increased susceptibility to viral and bacterial respiratory infections. In this study, we aimed to examine the association between vitamin D and COVID-19 risk and outcomes. We used logistic regression to identify associations between vitamin D variables and COVID-19 (risk of infection, hospitalisation and death) in 417,342 participants from UK Biobank. We subsequently performed a Mendelian Randomisation (MR) study to look for evidence of a causal effect. In total, 1746 COVID-19 cases (399 deaths) were registered between March and June 2020. We found no significant associations between COVID-19 infection risk and measured 25-OHD levels after adjusted for covariates, but this finding is limited by the fact that the vitamin D levels were measured on average 11 years before the pandemic. Ambient UVB was strongly and inversely associated with COVID-19 hospitalization and death overall and consistently after stratification by BMI and ethnicity. We also observed an interaction that suggested greater protective effect of genetically-predicted vitamin D levels when ambient UVB radiation is stronger. The main MR analysis did not show that genetically-predicted vitamin D levels are causally associated with COVID-19 risk (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.55-1.11, P = 0.160), but MR sensitivity analyses indicated a potential causal effect (weighted mode MR: OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.55-0.95, P = 0.021; weighted median MR: OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.92, P = 0.016). Analysis of MR-PRESSO did not find outliers for any instrumental variables and suggested a potential causal effect (OR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.98, p-val = 0.030). In conclusion, the effect of vitamin D levels on the risk or severity of COVID-19 remains controversial, further studies are needed to validate vitamin D supplementation as a means of protecting against worsened COVID-19.

Indexed as

AgedBiological Specimen BanksCalcifediolCOVID-19FemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMendelian Randomization AnalysisMiddle AgedOdds RatioProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2United KingdomCalcifediol

Identifiers

PMID34521884
PMCPMC8440633
OpenAlexW3200026456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.