Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34521878›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Carboplatin response in preclinical models for ovarian cancer: comparison of 2D monolayers, spheroids, ex vivo tumors and in vivo models.

Melica Nourmoussavi Brodeur, Kayla Simeone, Kim Leclerc-Deslauniers, Hubert Fleury, Euridice Carmona, Diane M Provencher, Anne-Marie Mes-Masson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Metastatic organotropism in small cell lung cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melica Nourmoussavi Brodeur *Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du Cancer de Montréal (ICM), CRCHUM, 900 Saint-Denis, Montreal, QC, H2X0A9, Canada.
Kayla Simeone *Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du Cancer de Montréal (ICM), CRCHUM, 900 Saint-Denis, Montreal, QC, H2X0A9, Canada.
Kim Leclerc-DeslauniersCentre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du Cancer de Montréal (ICM), CRCHUM, 900 Saint-Denis, Montreal, QC, H2X0A9, Canada.
Hubert FleuryCentre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du Cancer de Montréal (ICM), CRCHUM, 900 Saint-Denis, Montreal, QC, H2X0A9, Canada.
Euridice CarmonaCentre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du Cancer de Montréal (ICM), CRCHUM, 900 Saint-Denis, Montreal, QC, H2X0A9, Canada.
Diane M ProvencherCentre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du Cancer de Montréal (ICM), CRCHUM, 900 Saint-Denis, Montreal, QC, H2X0A9, Canada.
Anne-Marie Mes-MassonCentre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM) and Institut du Cancer de Montréal (ICM), CRCHUM, 900 Saint-Denis, Montreal, QC, H2X0A9, Canada. anne-marie.mes-masson@umontreal.ca.
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal gynecological cancer. Among the key challenges in developing effective therapeutics is the poor translation of preclinical models used in the drug discovery pipeline. This leaves drug attrition rates and costs at an unacceptably high level. Previous work has highlighted the discrepancies in therapeutic response between current in vitro and in vivo models. To address this, we conducted a comparison study to differentiate the carboplatin chemotherapy response across four different model systems including 2D monolayers, 3D spheroids, 3D ex vivo tumors and mouse xenograft models. We used six previously characterized EOC cell lines of varying chemosensitivity and performed viability assays for each model. In vivo results from the mouse model correlated with 2D response in 3/6 cell lines while they correlated with 3D spheroids and the ex vivo model in 4/6 and 5/5 cell lines, respectively. Our results emphasize the variability in therapeutic response across models and demonstrate that the carboplatin response in EOC cell lines cultured in a 3D ex vivo model correlates best with the in vivo response. These results highlight a more feasible, reliable, and cost-effective preclinical model with the highest translational potential for drug screening and prediction studies in EOC.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCarboplatinCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansMiceOvarian NeoplasmsSpheroids, CellularTumor Cells, CulturedXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic AgentsCarboplatin

Identifiers

PMID34521878
PMCPMC8440566
OpenAlexW3200678711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.