Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34521874›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Distinct neural sources underlying visual word form processing as revealed by steady state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP).

Fang Wang, Blair Kaneshiro, C Benjamin Strauber, Lindsey Hasak, Quynh Trang H Nguyen, Alexandra Yakovleva, Vladimir Y Vildavski, Anthony M Norcia, Bruce D McCandliss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frequency tagging of spatial attention using periliminal flickers.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fang WangGraduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Blair KaneshiroGraduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
C Benjamin StrauberGraduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Lindsey HasakGraduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Quynh Trang H NguyenGraduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Alexandra YakovlevaDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Vladimir Y VildavskiDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Anthony M NorciaDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Bruce D McCandlissGraduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. brucemc@stanford.edu.

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

EEG has been central to investigations of the time course of various neural functions underpinning visual word recognition. Recently the steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) paradigm has been increasingly adopted for word recognition studies due to its high signal-to-noise ratio. Such studies, however, have been typically framed around a single source in the left ventral occipitotemporal cortex (vOT). Here, we combine SSVEP recorded from 16 adult native English speakers with a data-driven spatial filtering approach-Reliable Components Analysis (RCA)-to elucidate distinct functional sources with overlapping yet separable time courses and topographies that emerge when contrasting words with pseudofont visual controls. The first component topography was maximal over left vOT regions with a shorter latency (approximately 180 ms). A second component was maximal over more dorsal parietal regions with a longer latency (approximately 260 ms). Both components consistently emerged across a range of parameter manipulations including changes in the spatial overlap between successive stimuli, and changes in both base and deviation frequency. We then contrasted word-in-nonword and word-in-pseudoword to test the hierarchical processing mechanisms underlying visual word recognition. Results suggest that these hierarchical contrasts fail to evoke a unitary component that might be reasonably associated with lexical access.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, VisualReadingAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTemporal LobeVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID34521874
PMCPMC8440525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.