ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2021
Perceptions of family medicine in Canada through the eyes of learners.
Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diving deep in the undergraduate medical education curriculum: Going beyond the tip of the iceberg for primary care solutions.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025Article
- What's in a name?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the perceptions of family medicine (FM) residents about their chosen specialty and how they perceive that patients, other specialists, and the government value FM.
designSelf-report data from the Family Medicine Longitudinal Survey collected from 2014 (time 1 [T1]) to 2016 (time 2 [T2]).
settingCanada.
participantsFamily medicine residents from 16 out of the 17 FM residency programs.
main outcome measuresResponses to statements in the survey were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale (from strongly disagree to strongly agree). Data were analyzed in 2 ways: cross sectionally (participation in either T1 or T2), and longitudinally (participation in both T1 and T2).
resultsFor both the cross-sectional cohorts (T1, n = 916; T2, n = 785) and the repeated-measures cohort (n = 420), most residents responded positively to feeling proud of becoming a family physician, with little change from entrance to exit. For both cohorts, a higher proportion of residents at the end of training reported that other medical specialists value the contributions of family physicians (
conclusionMost participating Canadian FM residents feel proud to become family physicians. This feeling may come from the perceptions of others who are believed to value FM, including other specialists. Measuring attitudinal perceptions offers a window to discover how FM is viewed and can offer a way to measure the effect of strategies implemented to advance the discipline of FM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.