Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34521682›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Cohort profile: The 'Children's Health in Care in Scotland' (CHiCS) study-a longitudinal dataset to compare health outcomes for care experienced children and general population children.

Mirjam Allik, Denise Brown, Courtney Taylor Browne Lūka, Cecilia Macintyre, Alastair H Leyland, Marion Henderson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mirjam AllikMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK mirjam.allik@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1674-3469
Denise BrownMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Courtney Taylor Browne LūkaSchool of Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Cecilia MacintyreData for Research Unit, Scottish Government, Edinburgh, UK.
Alastair H LeylandMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Marion HendersonSchool of Social Work & Social Policy, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit · GBScottish Government · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Children's Health in Care in Scotland Cohorts were set up to provide first population-wide evidence on the health outcomes of care experienced children (CEC) compared with children in the general population (CGP). To date, there are no data on how objective health outcomes, mortality and pregnancies for CEC are different from CGP in Scotland.

participantsThe CEC cohort includes school-aged children who were on the 2009/2010 Scottish Government's Children Looked After Statistics (CLAS) return and on the 2009 Pupil Census (PC). The children in the general population cohort includes those who were on the 2009 PC and not on any of the CLAS returns between 1 April 2007 and 31 July 2016. FINDINGS TO DATE: Data on a variety of health outcomes, including mortality, prescriptions, hospitalisations, pregnancies, and Accident & Emergency attendances, were obtained for the period 1 August 2009 to 31 July 2016 for both cohorts. Data on socioeconomic status (SES) for both cohorts were available from the Birth Registrations and a small area deprivation measure was available from the PC. CEC have, on average, lower SES at birth and live in areas of higher deprivation compared with CGP. A higher proportion of CEC have recorded events across all health data sets, and they experienced higher average rates of mortality, prescriptions and hospitalisations during the study period. The reasons for contacting health services vary between cohorts. FUTURE PLANS: Age-standardised rates for the two cohorts by sex and area deprivation will be calculated to provide evidence on population-wide prevalence of main causes of death, reasons for hospitalisation and types of prescription. Event history analysis will be used on matched cohorts to investigate the impact of placement histories and socioeconomic factors on health.

Indexed as

Child HealthHospitalizationChildCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornOutcome Assessment, Health CarePregnancyScotlandcommunity child healthepidemiologypublic healthsocial medicine

Identifiers

PMID34521682
PMCPMC8442099
OpenAlexW3199867092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.