Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34521669›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Barriers to follow-up after an abnormal cervical cancer screening result and the role of male partners: a qualitative study.

John Chapola, Fan Lee, Agatha Bula, Clement Mapanje, Billy Rodwell Phiri, Nenani Kamtuwange, Mercy Tsidya, Jennifer H Tang, Lameck Chinula

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John ChapolaData, University of North Carolina Project, Lilongwe, Central Region, Malawi johnchapola@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6669-6499
Fan LeeObstetrics and Gynecology Department, University of North Carolina System, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Agatha BulaNursing Department, University of North Carolina Project, Lilongwe, Central Region, Malawi.
Clement MapanjeClinical Department, University of North Carolina Project, Lilongwe, Central Region, Malawi.
Billy Rodwell PhiriNursing Department, University of North Carolina Project, Lilongwe, Central Region, Malawi.
Nenani KamtuwangeNursing Department, University of North Carolina Project, Lilongwe, Central Region, Malawi.
Mercy TsidyaQualitative Department, University of North Carolina Project, Lilongwe, Central Region, Malawi.
Jennifer H TangUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4238-2791
Lameck ChinulaClinical Department, University of North Carolina Project, Lilongwe, Central Region, Malawi.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of North Carolina System · US

Funding

Fogarty Global Health Fellows Coordinating CenterR25TW009340 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHI, BENJAMIN H. · 2012 to 2016
$6.9M
Project 3U54CA190152 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAMANIA, BLOSSOM A, GOPAL, SATISH · 2014 to 2019
$4.2M
UNC Global Women’s Health FellowshipT32HD075731 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHI, BENJAMIN H. · 2013 to 2024
$2.4M
FIC NIH HHS R25 TW009340NCI NIH HHS U54 CA190152NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD075731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths among women in Malawi, but preventable through screening. Malawi primarily uses visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) for screening, however, a follow-up for positive screening results remains a major barrier, in rural areas. We interviewed women who underwent a community-based screen-and-treat campaign that offered same-day treatment with thermocoagulation, a heat-based ablative procedure for VIA-positive lesions, to understand the barriers in accessing post-treatment follow-up and the role of male partners in contributing to, or overcoming these barriers.

methodsWe conducted in-depths interviews with 17 women recruited in a pilot study that evaluated the safety and acceptability of community-based screen-and-treat programme using VIA and thermocoagulation for cervical cancer prevention in rural Lilongwe, Malawi. Ten of the women interviewed presented for post-treatment follow-up at the healthcare facility and seven did not. The interviews were analysed for thematic content surrounding barriers for attending for follow-up and role of male partners in screening.

resultsTransportation was identified as a major barrier to post-thermocoagulation follow-up appointment, given long distances to the healthcare facility. Male partners were perceived as both a barrier for some, that is, not supportive of 6-week post-thermocoagulation abstinence recommendation, and as an important source of support for others, that is, encouraging follow-up attendance, providing emotional support to maintaining post-treatment abstinence and as a resource in overcoming transportation barriers. Regardless, the majority of women desired more male partner involvement in cervical cancer screening.

conclusionDespite access to same-day treatment, long travel distances to health facilities for post-treatment follow-up visits remained a major barrier for women in rural Lilongwe. Male partners were identified both as a barrier to, and an important source of support for accessing and completing the screen-and-treat programme. To successfully eliminate cervical cancer in Malawi, it is imperative to understand the day-to-day barriers women face in accessing preventative care.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMass ScreeningPilot Projectscancer painpublic healthreproductive medicinesexual medicine

Identifiers

PMID34521669
PMCPMC8442050
OpenAlexW3200464408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.