Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34521660›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

How do general practices respond to a pandemic? Protocol for a prospective qualitative study of six Australian practices.

Grant Russell, Jenny Advocat, Riki Lane, Jennifer Neil, Timothy Staunton-Smith, Karyn E Alexander, Simon Hattle, Benjamin F Crabtree, William L Miller, Sumudu Neilya Setunge and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Grant RussellDepartment of General Practice, Monash University Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Clayton, Victoria, Australia grant.russell@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3773-2355
Jenny AdvocatDepartment of General Practice, Monash University Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Riki LaneDepartment of General Practice, Monash University Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Jennifer NeilDepartment of General Practice, Monash University Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Timothy Staunton-SmithDepartment of General Practice, Monash University Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Karyn E AlexanderDepartment of General Practice, Monash University Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Simon HattleDepartment of General Practice, Monash University Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Benjamin F CrabtreeDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Research Division, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
William L MillerDepartment of Family Medicine, Leigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania, USA.
Sumudu Neilya SetungeDepartment of General Practice, Monash University Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4952-1515
Elizabeth Ann SturgissDepartment of General Practice, Monash University Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4428-4060
Monash Health · AUAsklepios Klinik Altona · DEAustralian National University · AULehigh Valley Hospital-Pocono · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has transformed healthcare systems worldwide. Primary care providers have been at the forefront of the pandemic response and have needed to rapidly adjust processes and routines around service delivery. The pandemic provides a unique opportunity to understand how general practices prepare for and respond to public health emergencies. We will follow a range of general practices to characterise the changes to, and factors influencing, modifications to clinical and organisational routines within Australian general practices amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective case study of multiple general practices using a participatory approach for design, data collection and analysis. The study is informed by the sociological concept of routines and will be set in six general practices in Melbourne, Australia during the 2020-2021 COVID-19 pandemic. General practitioners associated with the Monash University Department of General Practice will act as investigators who will shape the project and contribute to the data collection and analysis. The data will include investigator diaries, an observation template and interviews with practice staff and investigators. Data will first be analysed by two external researchers using a constant comparative approach and then later refined at regular investigator meetings. Cross-case analysis will explain the implementation, uptake and sustainability of routine changes that followed the commencement of the pandemic. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was granted by Monash University (23950) Human Research Ethics Committees. Practice reports will be made available to all participating practices both during the data analysis process and at the end of the study. Further dissemination will occur via publications and presentations to practice staff and medical practitioners.

Indexed as

COVID-19General PracticeAustraliaHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19organisation of health servicesprimary carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID34521660
PMCPMC8441220
OpenAlexW3198945804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.