ArticleBMJ open2021
Development and testing of the shared decision-making attitudes scale among nurses in Taiwan: a cross-sectional scale development study.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors Influencing Nurses' Intention and Behavior in Shared Decision-Making: A Cross-Sectional Study.The journal of nursing research : JNR · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and behavior regarding the implementation of shared decision-making among advanced practice nurses in Taiwan.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Measuring readiness for nurse-led shared decision making in clinical practice: development and first testing of the RSDM-N scale.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- The nursing shared decision making attitude scale: A translation and psychometric evaluation study.PEC innovation · 2024Article
- The Effects of the Situated Simulation Program on the Cultural Competence of Hemodialysis Nurses: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Barriers and Facilitators for Shared Decision Making in Breast Reconstruction among Stakeholders in the Chinese Context: A Qualitative Study.MDM policy & practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveShared decision-making (SDM) enhances medical care, but an appropriate tool for evaluating nursing staff's attitudes towards SDM in clinical practice is lacking. The objective of this study is to develop the Nursing Shared Decision-Making Attitude (NSDMA) scale and verify its psychometric properties.
designInstrument design study.
participantsA sample of 451 nursing staff.
interventionThis study comprised two phases. In phase 1, qualitative research and expert content validity were adopted to develop the first draft of the scale. In phase 2, Taiwanese nursing staff were recruited through convenience sampling, and the sample was divided into a calibration sample and a validation sample. An objective structured clinical examination of SDM attitudes was administered to 100 nursing staff to determine the scale's cut-off score. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to obtain the underlying factors of the NSDMA scale; McDonald's omega value was used to determine the reliability; known-group validity was used to test the construct validity; and the receiver operating characteristic curve was adopted to determine the scale's cut-off score.
resultsIn total, two factors were identified from the instrument results, which were termed 'empathic communication' and 'mastery learning'. The McDonald's omega value of the overall scale was 0.92. Known-group validity testing was performed based on the staff's participation in SDM courses and experience of SDM, and the results exhibited significant differences (t=5.49, p<0.001; t=2.43, p<0.05). Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve, the optimal cut-off for SDM attitudes was determined as 48.5 points.
conclusionsThe NSDMA scale enables the evaluation of SDM attitudes among clinical nursing staff and nursing managers; the results may serve as a reference for incorporation of SDM into nursing policy formulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.