Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34521596›Full record

ArticleJournal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society2021

Telehealth after the pandemic: Will the inverse care law apply? (Commentary).

Rebecca J Calthorpe, Alan R Smyth

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Virtual Care and the Inverse Care Law: Implications for Policy, Practice, Research, Public and Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A year in review: Real world evidence, functional monitoring and emerging therapeutics in 2021.Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca J CalthorpeDivision of Child Health, Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, UK. Electronic address: Rebecca.calthorpe@nottingham.ac.uk.
Alan R SmythDivision of Child Health, Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, UK.
University of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the use of telehealth within the cystic fibrosis (CF) community to deliver CF care. The article by Solomon and colleagues exploring the patient and family experiences of telehealth care delivery, as part of the CF chronic care model in the US, is therefore timely. In this commentary, we discuss how the US experience of telehealth care compares with reports from CF centres in other parts of the world. We highlight the potential challenges, including whether the inverse care law will apply in this new era of CF telehealth.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cystic FibrosisTelemedicineHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Cystic fibrosisTelehealthTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34521596
PMCPMC8433501
OpenAlexW3200841813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.