ArticleJournal of diabetes and its complications2021
Adults with type 2 diabetes benefit from self-management support intervention regardless of depressive symptoms.
Article in Journal of diabetes and its complications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emerging global interest: Unraveling the link between diabetes mellitus and depression.World journal of psychiatry · 2024Article
- Assessing the Prevalence of Diabetes Distress and Determining Its Psychosocial Predictors Among Saudi Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimsElevated depressive symptoms are common among adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). In a secondary analysis from an RCT of a diabetes self-management support intervention that did not target depressive symptoms, we sought to determine if depressive symptoms were reduced by the intervention (i.e., depressive symptoms an outcome) or, alternatively, if intervention effects on hemoglobin A1c were lesser among persons with clinically elevated depressive symptoms (i.e., depressive symptoms an effect modifier).
methodsWe evaluated a text messaging intervention, REACH, in a diverse (half non-white, half underinsured) sample of N = 506 adults with T2D. Participants completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ) and A1c tests at baseline and 6 months. We conducted a factor analysis to identify somatic- and cognitive-affective symptoms on the PHQ. We tested our hypotheses with regression models, using interaction terms and subgroup analyses.
resultsREACH improved depressive symptoms among participants with lower baseline A1c (<8.5%; β = -0.133, p = .007; cognitive β = -0.107, p = .038; somatic β = -0.131, p = .014) but not among participants with higher baseline A1c (≥8.5%; β = 0.040, p = .468). Baseline depressive symptoms did not modify the effect on A1c.
conclusionsWe found support for the hypothesis that depressive symptoms - both somatic- and cognitive-affective - may be an outcome, rather than an effect modifier, of effective diabetes self-management support interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.